Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for your great work!
Overall I'm +1 to switch to Azure as the primary CI tool if it's stable enough as I think there is no need to run both the travis and Azure for one single PR. However, there are still some improvements need to do and it would be great if these issues could be addressed before fully switch to Azure: - The report of Azure is still not viewable[1] (I noticed that Hequn has also reported this issue in another thread). This is very useful information. - For PR test of Azure pipeline, it seems that it will not rebase the master code before running the tests. Thanks, Dian [1] https://dev.azure.com/rmetzger/web/build.aspx?pcguid=03e2a4fd-f647-46c5-a324-527d2c2984ce&builduri=vstfs%3a%2f%2f%2fBuild%2fBuild%2f6593&tracking_data=eyJTb3VyY2UiOiJFbWFpbCIsIlR5cGUiOiJOb3RpZmljYXRpb24iLCJTSUQiOiIzMzk0MzciLCJTVHlwZSI6IkdSUCIsIlJlY2lwIjoxLCJfeGNpIjp7Ik5JRCI6NDAyODQ3NzksIk1SZWNpcCI6Im0wPTEgIiwiQWN0IjoiMTNjNDc3YWMtZTBjYS00MjJkLTkxOTItZWI0NzFkZmUzMWY0In0sIkVsZW1lbnQiOiJoZXJvL2N0YSJ9 <https://dev.azure.com/rmetzger/web/build.aspx?pcguid=03e2a4fd-f647-46c5-a324-527d2c2984ce&builduri=vstfs:///Build/Build/6593&tracking_data=eyJTb3VyY2UiOiJFbWFpbCIsIlR5cGUiOiJOb3RpZmljYXRpb24iLCJTSUQiOiIzMzk0MzciLCJTVHlwZSI6IkdSUCIsIlJlY2lwIjoxLCJfeGNpIjp7Ik5JRCI6NDAyODQ3NzksIk1SZWNpcCI6Im0wPTEgIiwiQWN0IjoiMTNjNDc3YWMtZTBjYS00MjJkLTkxOTItZWI0NzFkZmUzMWY0In0sIkVsZW1lbnQiOiJoZXJvL2N0YSJ9> > 在 2020年3月25日，下午3:33，Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> 写道： > > Some thoughts: > - by virtue of maintaining the past 2 releases we will have to maintain any > Travis infrastructure as long as 1.10 is supported, i.e., until 1.12 > - the azure setup doesn't appear to be equivalent yet since the java e2e > profile isn't setting the hadoop switch (-Pe2e-hadoop), as a result of which > SQLClientKafkaITCase isn't run > - the nightly scripts still seems to be using a maven version other than > 3.2.5; from today on master: > > 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7412964Z [INFO] --------< > org.apache.flink:flink-end-to-end-tests-common-kafka >-------- > 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7413854Z [INFO] Building > flink-end-to-end-tests-common-kafka 1.11-SNAPSHOT [39/46] > 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7414689Z [INFO] --------------------------------[ jar > ]--------------------------------- > 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7518360Z [INFO] > 2020-03-25T05:31:52.7519770Z [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.17:check > (validate) @ flink-end-to-end-tests-common-kafka --- > > - there is no real benefit in retiring the travis support in CiBot; the > important part is whether Travis is run or not for pull requests. > > From what I can tell though azure seems to be working fine for pull requests, > so +1 to at least disable the travis PR runs. > > On 23/03/2020 14:48, Robert Metzger wrote: >> Hey devs, >> >> I would like to discuss whether it makes sense to fully switch to Azure >> Pipelines and phase out our Travis integration. >> More information on our Azure integration can be found here: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2020/03/22/Migrating+Flink%27s+CI+Infrastructure+from+Travis+CI+to+Azure+Pipelines >> >> Travis will stay for the release-1.10 and older branches, as I have set up >> Azure only for the master branch. >> >> Proposal: >> - We keep the flinkbot infrastructure supporting both Travis and Azure >> around, while we are still receive pull requests and pushes for the >> "master" and "release-1.10" branches. >> - We remove the travis-specific files from "master", so that builds are not >> triggered anymore >> - once we receive no more builds at Travis (because 1.11 has been >> released), we remove the remaining travis-related infrastructure >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> Best, >> Robert >> >
