I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.

So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release blocker.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:

> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>
>
> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far as we
> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the flink-sql-connector-kafka
> > modules.
> >
> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source at
> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
> >
> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up in
> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing before
> > opening another RC.
> >
> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation, hence, -1.
> >
> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
> >>
> >> Checked:
> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected files,
> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
> >>
> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>
> >>
> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from Apache
> >> Kafka.
> >> The file states
> >>
> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is available
> >>> under the CDDL
> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located in
> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be confusing in
> >> that
> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue that
> >> this is
> >> not the right file,
> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be at
> >> risk of
> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or if
> >> this RC
> >> gets cancelled again).
> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
> >>
> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js", which is MIT
> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the license with
> >> each copy of the source.
> >> apache/flink also has this file:
> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js,
>
> >> but
> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even though this
> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release generation?!)
> >>
> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing license
> >> file in
> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I have
> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >> <tzuli...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
> >>>
> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for the
> >>> Maven
> >>> artifacts:
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
> >>>
> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original repo
> >>> posted
> >>> in this thread (
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
> >>>
> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been removed
> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use our own
> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/).
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the staged
> >>> Maven
> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the source
> >>> distribution,
> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end time.
> >>>
> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> >>> <tzuli...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which will have
> >>> the
> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
> >>>>> staging
> >>>>> repository.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>> tzuli...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the parent
> >>>>>> POM,
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging jars.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile itself
> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to Maven.
> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use our own
> >>>>> tooling
> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the source
> >>> tarballs
> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files Robert
> >>>>>> found.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely fine to
> >>> keep
> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really touched,
> >>> only
> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars packaged
> >>> for
> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the parent
> >>>>>> module
> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
> rmetz...@apache.org
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the maven
> >>> staging
> >>>>>>>> repo:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in docs/
> >>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>> jekyll
> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the release
> >>> to
> >>>>>> maven
> >>>>>>>> central?
> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release files
> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents are
> >>> sane
> >>>>> (no
> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions bundled
> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from fastutil
> >>> (
> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts looks
> >>> good.
> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator, statefun-flink-core
> >>> (copied
> >>>>>>>>> sources).
> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain ASLv2
> >>> LICENSE
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles / doc
> >>>>> configs
> >>>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled (mvn
> >>>>> clean
> >>>>>>>> verify
> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct POM /
> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python Greeter
> >>> /
> >>>>>>>> Python
> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS ecosystem:
> >>> remote
> >>>>>>>> Python
> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway, Java
> >>>>> embedded
> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to include
> >>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
> >>>>>>>>> konstan...@ververica.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4* for the
> >>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>>>>>>> comments)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
> >>> collaborating
> >>>>>>>> testing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
> >>> guideline
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> what
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply put
> >>>>> your
> >>>>>>>> name
> >>>>>>>>>>> down
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution, to be
> >>>>>>>> deployed to
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
> >>> deployed
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> PyPI
> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> >>>>> Repository
> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned artifacts
> >>>>> are as
> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
> >>>>> corresponding
> >>>>>> dev
> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> >>>>>> Repository
> >>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images for
> >>>>> Stateful
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
> >>> creation
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars already
> >>>>>> deployed
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts are
> >>>>>>>> officially
> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing about
> >>>>> where
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> host
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked on
> >>> (by
> >>>>>>>> Marta)
> >>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
> >>> Functions
> >>>>>>>>> project.
> >>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards in
> >>> this
> >>>>>> vote
> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your votes
> >>>>> already.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being worked on,
> >>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from there.
> >>>>> Here
> >>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous RCs,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting Monday
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >>>>>> affirmative
> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
> >>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
> >>>>>
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
> >>> contents:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>    <activeProfiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>    </activeProfiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>    <profiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>      <profile>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>        <repositories>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>          <repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>            <url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>          </repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>          <repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>            <id>archetype</id>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>            <url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>          </repository>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>        </repositories>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>      </profile>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>    </profiles>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via `--settings
> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the staged
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache
> >>>>> Flink
> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung
> >>>>>> Jason,
> >>>>>>>> Ji
> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to