+1 (non-binding)

- verified the checksum and signature
- checked the release note
- checked that there are no new dependencies introduced since 1.9.2 which
may affect the license (only bump kafka from 0.10.2.1 to 0.10.2.2 which
doesn't affect the license)
- checked that there are no missing artifacts in staging area
- checked that the pyflink package could be pip installed

Regards,
Dian

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:35 PM Fabian Paul <fabianp...@data-artisans.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Verified signature
> - Built from source (Java8)
> - Run custom jobs on Kubernetes
>
> Regards,
> Fabian
>
> > On 18. Apr 2020, at 04:37, Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.9.3,
> > as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
> be
> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > fingerprint 6B6291A8502BA8F0913AE04DDEB95B05BF075300 [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag "release-1.9.3-rc1" [5],
> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> blog
> > post [6].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dian
> >
> > [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346867
> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.3-rc1/
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1353/
> > [5]
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/6d23b2c38c7a8fd8855063238c744923e1985a63
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/329
>
>

Reply via email to