Good job Dian! Thank you for helping to maintain the state of FLIPs which is very important for the community to understand the progress of FLIPs.
Best, Jincheng Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月4日周二 下午5:41写道： > Hi all, > > When going through the status of existing FLIPs[1], I found that the > status of quite a few of FLIPs are out of date. > > 1) For the FLIPs which I'm pretty sure that are already finished(the > umbrella JIRA has been resolved), I have updated the status of them by > moving them from "Adopted/Accepted but unreleased FLIPs" to "Implemented > and Released FLIPs": > > - FLIP-52: Remove legacy Program interface. > - FLIP-57: Rework FunctionCatalog > - FLIP-63: Rework table partition support > - FLIP-68: Extend Core Table System with Pluggable Modules > - FLIP-73: Introducing Executors for job submission > - FLIP-81: Executor-related new ConfigOptions. > - FLIP-84: Improve & Refactor API of TableEnvironment > - FLIP-85: Flink Application Mode > - FLIP-86: Improve Connector Properties > - FLIP 87: Primary key constraints in Table API > - FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink > - FLIP-103: Better TM/JM Log Display > - FLIP-123: DDL and DML compatibility for Hive connector > - FLIP-124: Add open/close and Collector to (De)SerializationSchema > > > 2) For the following FLIPs, it seems that the work has already been > finished. However, as the umbrella JIRA is still open and so I'm leaving > the status of them as it is: > > - FLIP-55: Introduction of a Table API Java Expression DSL > - FLIP-93: JDBC catalog and Postgres catalog > - FLIP-110: Support LIKE clause in CREATE TABLE > > > 3) For the following FLIPs, there are still some open subtasks. However, > it seems that the main work has already been finished and so I guess(not > quite sure) maybe we should also move them to "Implemented and Released > FLIPs": > > - FLIP-43: State Processing API > - FLIP-66: Support time attribute in SQL DDL > - FLIP-69: Flink SQL DDL Enhancement > - FLIP-79: Flink Function DDL Support > > For the FLIPs under 2) and 3), it would be great if the people who are > familiar with them could double check that whether we should update the > status of them. > > Thanks, > Dian > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals > >
