FLINK-18902 and FLINK-18646 have been merged into the release-1.10 branch. >From my side you are good to go to create the next RC now.
Cheers, Till On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:03 PM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you all for the efforts verifying the RC. And thanks @Till Rohrmann > <trohrm...@apache.org> for the information of FLINK-18646 and FLINK-18902. > > The vote is hereby canceled. I will prepare the next RC after FLINK-18646 > and FLINK-18902 are properly resolved. > > Thanks, > Zhu Zhu > > Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2020年8月12日周三 下午10:59写道： > >> I've opened a PR for FLINK-18902 [1]. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13131 >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 3:02 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Another problem occurred recently [1]. I think we need to fix this >> problem >> > before releasing Flink 1.10.2. I will work on it. >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18902 >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Till >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:35 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> -1 (binding), see below for the explanation. >> >> >> >> - verified checksums and signatures >> >> - verified that dependency changes are reflected in NOTICE/LICENSE >> files >> >> - built Flink with Scala 2.12 support from sources >> >> - Started cluster and ran example jobs, no suspicious log output >> >> >> >> I noticed that Flink 1.10.2 contains FLINK-15758 [1]. There was a >> problem >> >> with this ticket which was fixed with FLINK-18646 [2] but which was not >> >> back ported to Flink 1.10.2. @Andrey Zagrebin <azagre...@apache.org> >> was >> >> there a specific reason why we didn't do it? I think the Flink 1.10.2 >> >> release should either contain both fixes or none. Hence, I vote -1 >> >> (binding) for this release until this problem is resolved. >> >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15758 >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18646 >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Till >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:11 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> +1 (binding) >> >>> >> >>> I went through the commit diff and changed files of this release. >> Could >> >>> not spot anything suspicious. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Timo >> >>> >> >>> On 11.08.20 14:47, Zhu Zhu wrote: >> >>> > Hi everyone, >> >>> > >> >>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version >> >>> 1.10.2, >> >>> > as follows: >> >>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release >> >>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >> comments) >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which >> includes: >> >>> > * JIRA release notes [1], >> >>> > * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases >> >>> to be >> >>> > deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with >> >>> > fingerprint C63E230EFFF519A5BBF2C9AE6767487CD505859C [3], >> >>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], >> >>> > * source code tag "release-1.10.2-rc1" [5], >> >>> > * website pull request listing the new release and adding >> announcement >> >>> blog >> >>> > post [6]. >> >>> > >> >>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >> majority >> >>> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >> >>> > >> >>> > Thanks, >> >>> > Zhu Zhu >> >>> > >> >>> > [1] >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12347791 >> >>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.10.2-rc1/ >> >>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS >> >>> > [4] >> >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1383/ >> >>> > [5] >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4033014695061b05a720edc766f1c722cdb32d6e >> >>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/366 >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >
