Thanks for the update Xingbo!

Pandas UDAF can reuse the `class aggregate function (user defined
function)` interface in FLIP-139, and the core logic of Pandas UDAF users
is written in the `accumulate` method. In this way, we can unify the
interface semantics of all UDAF.

What do you think?

Best,
Jincheng



Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月31日周一 下午6:06写道:

> Hi Jincheng,
>
> Thanks a lot for joining the discussion and the suggestion of discussing
> FLIP-137 and FLIP-139 together.
>
> >> 1. We also need to consider how pandas UDAF supports metrics, and
> whether
> we need a custom interface for pandas UDAF?
>
> Yes. We need to add an interface so that users can add some logic in the
> `open` or `close` method such as creating metrics. I have added the
> definition of the interface and the corresponding example in the doc.
>
> >> 2. We have added @udaf(), so whether to use ordinary Python UDAF?
>
> Yes. From the overall view of Python User Defined Function, we use @udf to
> describe general python udf and pandas udf, @udtf to describe python udtf,
> and @udaf to describe general python udaf and pandas udaf, which is more
> unified. I will discuss it in FLIP-139 later.
>
> Best,
> Xingbo
>
> jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月31日周一 上午11:05写道:
>
> > Hi Xingbo,
> >
> > Thanks for the discussion! Overall, + 1 for this FLIP.
> > I have two points to add:
> >
> >  - We also need to consider how pandas UDAF supports metrics, and whether
> > we need a custom interface for pandas UDAF?
> >  - We have added @udaf(), so whether to use ordinary Python UDAF? If not,
> > the addition of @udaf is not appropriate. We need to discuss it further.
> >
> > We can consider it combination with FLIP-139 for design. What do you
> think?
> >
> > Best,
> > Jincheng
> >
> >
> > Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月24日周一 下午2:25写道:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a discussion thread on "Support Pandas UDAF in
> > > PyFlink"
> > >
> > > Pandas UDF has been supported in FLINK 1.11 (FLIP-97[1]). It solves the
> > > high serialization/deserialization overhead in Python UDF and makes it
> > > convenient to leverage the popular Python libraries such as Pandas,
> > Numpy,
> > > etc. Since Pandas UDF has so many advantages, we want to support Pandas
> > > UDAF to extend usage of Pandas UDF.
> > >
> > > Dian Fu and I have discussed offline and have drafted the FLIP-137[2].
> It
> > > includes the following items:
> > >   - Support Pandas UDAF in Batch Group Aggregation
> > >   - Support Pandas UDAF in Batch Group Window Aggregation
> > >   - Support Pandas UDAF in Batch Over Window Aggregation
> > >   - Support Pandas UDAF in Stream Group Window Aggregation
> > >   - Support Pandas UDAF in Stream Bounded Over Window Aggregation
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your feedback!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Xingbo
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-97%3A+Support+Scalar+Vectorized+Python+UDF+in+PyFlink
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-137%3A+Support+Pandas+UDAF+in+PyFlink
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to