+1 (non-binding). It would be a great improvement, thanks for the effort!
Regards, Roman On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:49 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > Some of our users have asked for this tradeoff of consistency over > availability for some cases. > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:02 PM Zhijiang <[email protected] > .invalid> > wrote: > > > Thanks for driving this effort, Yuan. > > > > +1 (binding) on my side. > > > > Best, > > Zhijiang > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From:Piotr Nowojski <[email protected]> > > Send Time:2020年10月19日(星期一) 21:02 > > To:dev <[email protected]> > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-135: Approximate Task-Local Recovery > > > > Hey, > > > > I carry over my +1 (binding) from the discussion thread. > > > > Best, > > Piotrek > > > > pon., 19 paź 2020 o 14:56 Yuan Mei <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > I would like to start a voting thread for FLIP-135 [1], for approximate > > > task local recovery. The proposal has been discussed in [2]. > > > > > > The vote will be open till Oct. 23rd (72h, excluding weekends) unless > > there > > > is an objection or not enough votes. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-135+Approximate+Task-Local+Recovery > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-135-Approximate-Task-Local-Recovery-tp43930.html > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > Yuan > > > > > > > >
