+1

Thanks Leonard for driving this topic.

Best,
Jingsong

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:44 PM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:43 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Timo
> >
> > On 03.03.21 04:14, Jark Wu wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-162 [1], which has been
> > discussed
> > >> and
> > >> reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2].
> > >>
> > >> Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment.
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open until March 5th (72h), unless there is an
> > objection
> > >> or not enough votes.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Leonard
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-162%3A+Consistent+Flink+SQL+time+function+behavior
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-162:+Consistent+Flink+SQL+time+function+behavior
> > >>>
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-162-Consistent-Flink-SQL-time-function-behavior-tc48116.html
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-162-Consistent-Flink-SQL-time-function-behavior-tc48116.html
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Best, Jingsong Lee

Reply via email to