The vote has not reached the required number of votes to be considered
successful.
As outlined in the bylaws
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026#FlinkBylaws-Actions>
FLIP votes require 3 binding +1 votes (i.e., from committers).
On 10/07/2021 16:13, Márton Balassi wrote:
Hi team,
Thank you for your input, I am closing this vote as successful.
Austin: thank you, I have added the experimental annotation explicitly to
the FLIP.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
The @Experimental annotation is really missing, Marton could you add it
please?
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:04 PM Austin Cawley-Edwards <
austin.caw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Márton,
The FLIP looks generally good to me, though could we add the
`@Experimental` annotation to the proposed interfaces so it is in sync
with
what was agreed in the discussion thread?
Thanks,
Austin
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:40 AM Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 from my side
This is a good addition that will open many possibilities in the future
and
solve some immediate issues with the current Kerberos integration.
Gyula
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:50 PM Márton Balassi <
balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi everyone, I would like to start a vote on FLIP-181 [1] which was
discussed in this thread [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72
hours
until July 9th unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/CAUBCw
[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53b6b8931b6248a849855dad27b1a431e55cdd48ca055910e8f015a8%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
