I think this will be a useful addition.

Regarding the API and specific design decisions: I think this looks ok.
I didn't dig very deep and would be fine to just go with the author's
proposal. The main motivation for having a separate flink-ml repository was
to develop more easily, make changes and iterate faster without having to
weight every design as carefully as we need to do it in core Flink.

So +1 from my side

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:33 AM Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We would like to start the vote for FLIP-173: Support DAG of
> algorithms [1]. This FLIP was discussed in this thread [2].
>
> The proposal extended the Flink ML API to support DAG of algorithms where
> each algorithm could have multiple inputs and multiple outputs. It also
> extended Flink ML API to support online learning scenarios where a
> long-running Model instance needs to be continuously updated by the latest
> model data generated by another long-running Estimator instance.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, following the consensus voting
> process.
>
> Thanks!
> Dong Lin and Zhipeng Zhang
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=184615783
> [2]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6729f351fb1bc13a93754c199d5fee1051cc8146e22374737c578779%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>

Reply via email to