hehuiyuan created FLINK-26498:
---------------------------------

             Summary: The window result may not have been  emitted when use 
window emit feature and use lateTrigger. 
                 Key: FLINK-26498
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26498
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Table SQL / Planner
            Reporter: hehuiyuan
         Attachments: image-2022-03-05-23-53-37-086.png, 
image-2022-03-05-23-53-44-196.png, image-2022-03-06-00-03-11-670.png

the sql of job :

 
{code:java}
CREATE TABLE tableSource(
    name string,
    age int not null,
    sex string,
    dt TIMESTAMP(3),
    WATERMARK FOR dt AS dt - INTERVAL '0' SECOND
) WITH (

);



CREATE TABLE tableSink(
    windowstart timestamp(3),
    windowend timestamp(3),
    name string,
    age int,
    cou bigint
)
WITH (

);
INSERT INTO tablesink
  SELECT
    TUMBLE_START(dt, INTERVAL '1' HOUR),
    TUMBLE_END(dt, INTERVAL '1' HOUR),
    name,
    age,
    count(sex)
FROM tableSource
GROUP BY TUMBLE(dt, INTERVAL '1' HOUR), name,age {code}
 and table config:

 

 
{code:java}
table.exec.emit.allow-lateness = 1 hour 
table.exec.emit.late-fire.delay = 1 min
table.exec.emit.early-fire.delay = 1min{code}
The data:

 

 
{code:java}
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:30:22.000
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:40:22.000
 //pause ,wait for the window trigger for earlyTrigger 1 min
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:50:22.000
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:56:22.000
//pause ,wait for the window trigger for earlyTrigger 1 min 
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 01:00:00.000
//pause ,wait for the window trigger for earlyTrigger 1 min 
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:59:20.000 --latency data
//pause ,wait for the window trigger for earlyTrigger 1 min 
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:59:20.100 --latency data 
>>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 02:00:00.000 -- window state clean for 
>[0:00:00 1:00:00]
>hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 02:10:00.000 {code}
The result:
{code:java}
> +I(+I[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 2])

> -U(-U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 2]) 
> +U(+U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 4]) 

> +I(+I[2022-03-05T01:00, 2022-03-05T02:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 1])

> -U(-U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 4]) 
> +U(+U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 5])
 
 
> +I(+I[2022-03-05T02:00, 2022-03-05T03:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 2]) {code}
 

`hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 00:59:20.100` is lost, the lateTrigger is not 
trigger and the window[0:00:00 ,1:00:00] is cleaned when the data 
`hehuiyuan1,22,woman,2022-03-05 02:00:00.000` arrived that updated watermark.

 

The window[0:00:00 ,1:00:00]   has 6 pieces of data, but we got 5.

The trigger is AfterEndOfWindowEarlyAndLate .

So WindowOpearator may need to emit reuslt when the window cleanupTimer call 
onEventTime.

I think the correct result is as follows:

 

 
{code:java}
> +I(+I[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 2])

> -U(-U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 2])
> +U(+U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 4])

> +I(+I[2022-03-05T01:00, 2022-03-05T02:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 1])

> -U(-U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 4])
> +U(+U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 5])

> -U(-U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 5])
> +U(+U[2022-03-05T00:00, 2022-03-05T01:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 6])
> +I(+I[2022-03-05T02:00, 2022-03-05T03:00, hehuiyuan1, 22, 2]) {code}
 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to