Sounds like a good plan. Thank you! Am Fr., 17. Juni 2022 um 12:33 Uhr schrieb David Anderson < dander...@apache.org>:
> After hitting pause on the 1.15.1 release a couple of days ago because of > FLINK-28060 [1], I want to hit resume now. You should go read that ticket > if you want the details, but the summary is that the upgrade of the Kafka > Clients to 2.8.1 that was done in Flink 1.15.0 is causing a bug that means > that after a Kafka broker restarts, subsequent attempts by Flink to commit > Kafka offsets will fail until Flink is restarted. The only good fix > available to us appears to be upgrading the Kafka Clients to version 3.1.1. > > It doesn't seem wise to upgrade the Kafka Clients from 2.8.1 to 3.1.1 for > Flink 1.15.1. That's a big change to make this close to our release, and we > shouldn't delay this release any further. So here's a proposal: > > - We bump the Kafka Clients to 3.1.1 in master now. > - We don't try to fix FLINK-28060 for 1.15.1. > > > - We create the Flink 1.15.1 release straight away, noting that there's > a known issue with Kafka (FLINK-28060). > - We reach out to the Kafka community to see if they're willing to > create a 2.8.2 release with a backport of the fix for this bug. > - In parallel, we merge a bump of the Kafka Clients to 3.1.1 after > 1.15.1 is done, to see how it behaves on the CI for the next few weeks, > and > plan a quick Flink 1.15.2 release (most likely something like a month > later). > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28060 > > Best, > David > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:37 AM David Anderson <dander...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I'm now thinking we should delay 1.15.1 long enough to see if we can > > include a fix for FLINK-28060 [1], which is a serious regression > affecting > > several Kafka users. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28060 > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:15 PM David Anderson <dander...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Since no one has brought up any blockers, I'll plan to start the release > >> process on Monday unless I hear otherwise. > >> > >> Best, > >> David > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:20 AM Yun Gao <yungao...@aliyun.com.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> Very thanks for driving the new version, also +1 since we already > >>> accumulated some fixes. > >>> > >>> Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27492, currently > >>> there are still some > >>> controversy with how to deal with the artifacts. I also agree we may > not > >>> hold up the release > >>> with this issue. We'll try to reach to the consensus as soon as > possible > >>> to try best catching > >>> up with the release. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Yun > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> From:LuNing Wang <wang4lun...@gmail.com> > >>> Send Time:2022 Jun. 9 (Thu.) 10:10 > >>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > >>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing 1.15.1 > >>> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> Thank you for driving this. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> LuNing Wang > >>> > >>> Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com> 于2022年6月8日周三 20:45写道： > >>> > >>> > +1 > >>> > > >>> > Thanks David for driving it! > >>> > > >>> > Best regards, > >>> > Jing > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hi David, > >>> > > > >>> > > +1 > >>> > > Thank you for driving this. > >>> > > > >>> > > Best, > >>> > > Xingbo > >>> > > > >>> > > Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> 于2022年6月8日周三 18:41写道： > >>> > > > >>> > > > +1 > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Thank you for proposing this. I can take care of the PMC-side of > >>> > things. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On 08/06/2022 12:37, Jingsong Li wrote: > >>> > > > > +1 > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks David for volunteering to manage the release. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Best, > >>> > > > > Jingsong > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:21 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > > > >> Hi David, thank you for driving the release. > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> +1 for the 1.15.1 release. The release-1.15 branch > >>> > > > >> already contains many bug fixes and some SQL > >>> > > > >> issues are quite critical. > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> Btw, FLINK-27606 has been merged just now. > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> Best, > >>> > > > >> Jark > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 17:40, David Anderson < > >>> dander...@apache.org> > >>> > > > wrote: > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >>> I would like to start a discussion on releasing 1.15.1. Flink > >>> 1.15 > >>> > > was > >>> > > > >>> released on the 5th of May [1] and so far 43 issues have been > >>> > > resolved, > >>> > > > >>> including several user-facing issues with blocker and > critical > >>> > > > priorities > >>> > > > >>> [2]. (The recent problem with FileSink rolling policies not > >>> working > >>> > > > >>> properly in 1.15.0 got me thinking it might be time for > bug-fix > >>> > > > release.) > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> There currently remain 16 unresolved tickets with a > fixVersion > >>> of > >>> > > > 1.15.1 > >>> > > > >>> [3], five of which are about CI infrastructure and tests. > >>> There is > >>> > > > only one > >>> > > > >>> such ticket marked Critical: > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27492 Flink > table > >>> > scala > >>> > > > >>> example > >>> > > > >>> does not including the scala-api jars > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> I'm not convinced we should hold up a release for this issue, > >>> but > >>> > on > >>> > > > the > >>> > > > >>> other hand, it seems that this issue can be resolved by > making > >>> a > >>> > > > decision > >>> > > > >>> about how to handle the missing dependencies. @Timo Walther > >>> > > > >>> <twal...@apache.org> @yun_gao can you give an update? > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> Two other open issues seem to have made significant progress > >>> > (listed > >>> > > > >>> below). Would it make sense to wait for either of these? Are > >>> there > >>> > > any > >>> > > > >>> other open tickets we should consider waiting for? > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27420 Suspended > >>> > > > SlotManager > >>> > > > >>> fail to reregister metrics when started again > >>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27606 > >>> CompileException > >>> > > > when > >>> > > > >>> using UDAF with merge() method > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> I would volunteer to manage the release. Is there a PMC > member > >>> who > >>> > > > would > >>> > > > >>> join me to help, as needed? > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> Best, > >>> > > > >>> David > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> [1] > >>> > https://flink.apache.org/news/2022/05/05/1.15-announcement.html > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> [2] > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.15.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> [3] > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27492?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.15.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > -- https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk
