+1 This looks reasonable.
Best, tison. Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> 于2022年8月9日周二 21:33写道： > +1 for bumping the Kafka dependency. > > Flink X.Y.0 releases require thorough testing, so considering the severity > of the problem this is still good timing, even that close to the first RC. > > Thanks for bringing this up. > > Thomas > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:51 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > The Kafka upgrade in 1.15.0 resulted in a regression > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28060) where offsets are > > not committed to Kafka, impeding monitoring and the starting offsets > > functionality of the connector. > > > > This has been fixed a about a week ago in Kafka 3.2.1. > > > > The question is whether we want to upgrade Kafka so close to the feature > > freeze. I'm usually not a friend of doing that in general, but in this > > case there is a specific issue we'd like to get fixed and we still have > > the entire duration of the feature freeze to observe the behavior. > > > > I'd like to know what you think about this. > > > > For reference, our current Kafka version is 3.1.1, and our CI is passing > > with 3.2.1. > > > > > > >
