Hi, Jane. Thanks for you input. I think we can add the auxiliary command show procedures in this FLIP. Following the syntax for show functions proposed in FLIP-297. The syntax will be SHOW PROCEDURES [ ( FROM | IN ) [catalog_name.]database_name ] [ [NOT] (LIKE | ILIKE) <sql_like_pattern> ]. I have updated to this FLIP.
The other auxiliary commands maybe not suitable currently or need a further/dedicated dicussion. Let's keep this FLIP focus. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-297%3A+Improve+Auxiliary+Sql+Statements Best regards, Yuxia ----- 原始邮件 ----- 发件人: "Jane Chan" <qingyue....@gmail.com> 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org> 发送时间: 星期六, 2023年 6 月 03日 下午 7:04:39 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-311: Support Call Stored Procedure Hi Yuxia, Thanks for bringing this to the discussion. The call procedure is a widely used feature and will be very useful for users. I just have one question regarding the usage. The FLIP mentioned that Flink will allow connector developers to develop their own built-in stored > procedures, and then enables users to call these predefiend stored > procedures. > In this FLIP, we don't intend to allow users to customize their own stored > procedure for we don't want to expose too much to users too early. If I understand correctly, we might need to provide some auxiliary commands to inform users what built-in procedures are provided and how to use them. For example, Snowflake provides commands like [1] [2], and MySQL provides commands like [3] [4]. [1] SHOW PROCEDURES, https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/sql/show-procedures [2] DESCRIBE PROCEDURE <procedure_name>, https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/sql/desc-procedure [3] SHOW PROCEDURE CODE， https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/show-procedure-code.html [4] SHOW PROCEDURE STATUS, https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/show-procedure-status.html Best, Jane On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 3:20 PM Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Yuxia for the explanation, it makes sense to me. It would be great > if you also add this to the FLIP doc. > > yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年6月1日周四 17:11写道： > > > Hi, Benchao. > > Thanks for your attention. > > > > Initially, I also want to pass `TableEnvironment` to procedure. But > > according my investegation and offline discussion with Jingson, the real > > important thing for procedure devs is the ability to build Flink > > datastream. But we can't get the `StreamExecutionEnvironment` which is > the > > entrypoint to build datastream. That's to say we will lost the ability to > > build a datastream if we just pass `TableEnvironment`. > > > > Of course, we can also pass `TableEnvironment` along with > > `StreamExecutionEnvironment` to Procedure. But I'm intend to be cautious > > about exposing too much too early to procedure devs. If someday we find > we > > will need `TableEnvironment` to custom a procedure, we can then add a > > method like `getTableEnvironment()` in `ProcedureContext`. > > > > Best regards, > > Yuxia > > > > ----- 原始邮件 ----- > > 发件人: "Benchao Li" <libenc...@apache.org> > > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org> > > 发送时间: 星期四, 2023年 6 月 01日 下午 12:58:08 > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-311: Support Call Stored Procedure > > > > Thanks Yuxia for opening this discussion, > > > > The general idea looks good to me, I only have one question about the > > `ProcedureContext#getExecutionEnvironment`. Why are you proposing to > return > > a `StreamExecutionEnvironment` instead of `TableEnvironment`, could you > > elaborate a little more on this? > > > > Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2023年5月30日周二 17:58写道： > > > > > Thanks for your explanation. > > > > > > We can support Iterable in future. Current design looks good to me. > > > > > > Best, > > > Jingsong > > > > > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 4:56 PM yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, Jingsong. > > > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > > > > > > > Does this need to be a function call? Do you have some example? > > > > I think it'll be useful to support function call when user call > > > procedure. > > > > The following example is from iceberg:[1] > > > > CALL catalog_name.system.migrate('spark_catalog.db.sample', > map('foo', > > > 'bar')); > > > > > > > > It allows user to use `map('foo', 'bar')` to pass a map data to > > > procedure. > > > > > > > > Another case that I can imagine may be rollback a table to the > snapshot > > > of one week ago. > > > > Then, with function call, user may call `rollback(table_name, now() - > > > INTERVAL '7' DAY)` to acheive such purpose. > > > > > > > > Although it can be function call, the eventual parameter got by the > > > procedure will always be the literal evaluated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Procedure looks like a TableFunction, do you consider using > Collector > > > > something like TableFunction? (Supports large amount of data) > > > > > > > > Yes, I had considered it. But returns T[] is for simpility, > > > > > > > > First, regarding how to return the calling result of a procedure, it > > > looks more intuitive to me to use the return result of the `call` > method > > > instead of by calling something like collector#collect. > > > > Introduce a collector will increase necessary complexity. > > > > > > > > Second, regarding supporting large amount of data, acoording my > > > investagtion, I haven't seen the requirement that supports returning > > large > > > amount of data. > > > > Iceberg also return an array.[2] If you do think we should support > > large > > > amount of data, I think we can change to return type from T[] to > > Iterable<T> > > > > > > > > [1]: > https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-procedures/#migrate > > > > [2]: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/601c5af9b6abded79dabeba177331310d5487f43/spark/v3.2/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/iceberg/catalog/Procedure.java#L44 > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Yuxia > > > > > > > > ----- 原始邮件 ----- > > > > 发件人: "Jingsong Li" <jingsongl...@gmail.com> > > > > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org> > > > > 发送时间: 星期一, 2023年 5 月 29日 下午 2:42:04 > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-311: Support Call Stored Procedure > > > > > > > > Thanks Yuxia for the proposal. > > > > > > > > > CALL [catalog_name.][database_name.]procedure_name ([ expression [, > > > expression]* ] ) > > > > > > > > The expression can be a function call. Does this need to be a > function > > > > call? Do you have some example? > > > > > > > > > Procedure returns T[] > > > > > > > > Procedure looks like a TableFunction, do you consider using Collector > > > > something like TableFunction? (Supports large amount of data) > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Jingsong > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 2:33 PM yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, everyone. > > > > > > > > > > I’d like to start a discussion about FLIP-311: Support Call Stored > > > Procedure [1] > > > > > > > > > > Stored procedure provides a convenient way to encapsulate complex > > > logic to perform data manipulation or administrative tasks in external > > > storage systems. It's widely used in traditional databases and popular > > > compute engines like Trino for it's convenience. Therefore, we propose > > > adding support for call stored procedure in Flink to enable better > > > integration with external storage systems. > > > > > > > > > > With this FLIP, Flink will allow connector developers to develop > > their > > > own built-in stored procedures, and then enables users to call these > > > predefiend stored procedures. > > > > > > > > > > Looking forward to your feedbacks. > > > > > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-311%3A+Support+Call+Stored+Procedure > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Yuxia > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best, > > Benchao Li > > > > > -- > > Best, > Benchao Li >
