-0 (binding)

I'm not going to block this effort because it's still possible to cover
other occurrences in a subsequent FLIP if it's considered useful (I'm not
in the position to judge how important the IOReadableWritable interface is
in the context of removing the DataSet API).

The recent discussion around what is allowed to be added to 1.18 after the
feature freeze [1] prevents us from moving forward with FLIP-347 in 1.18,
anyway. Therefore, we could use the time to extend the FLIP to become a
larger effort around making IOReadableWritable implementations immutable as
suggested in FLINK-4758 [2].

I mentioned this in the FLIP's discussion thread as well.

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/7l1c9ybqgyc1mx7t7tk4wkc1cm8481o9
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4758

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:21 AM weijie guo <guoweijieres...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Weijie
>
>
> Yuxin Tan <tanyuxinw...@gmail.com> 于2023年7月26日周三 16:11写道:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Yuxin
> >
> >
> > Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2023年7月26日周三 16:09写道:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Xintong
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:29 PM Wencong Liu <liuwencle...@163.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi dev,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-347.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Discussion thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3gcxhnqpsvb85golnlxf9tv5p43xkjgj
> > > > FLIP:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-347%3A+Remove+IOReadableWritable+serialization+in+Path
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Wencong Liu
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to