Hi Jing,

I agree we could wait for the result with Java 11. And it should be
available next Monday.
Additionally, I could also build a pipeline with Java 17 later since
it is supported in 1.18[1].


Best regards,
Zakelly

[1] 
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/9c1318ca7fa5b2e7b11827068ad1288483aaa464#diff-8310c97396d60e96766a936ca8680f1e2971ef486cfc2bc55ec9ca5a5333c47fR53

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:57 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi Zakelly,
>
> Thanks for your effort and the update! Since Java 8 has been deprecated[1],
> let's wait for the result with Java 11. It should be available after the
> weekend and there should be no big surprise. WDYT?
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> [1]
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/release-notes/flink-1.15/#jdk-upgrade
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I want to provide an update on the benchmark results that I have been
> > working on. After spending some time preparing the environment and
> > adjusting the benchmark script, I finally got a comparison between
> > release 1.18 (commit: 2aeb99804ba[1]) and the commit before the old
> > codespeed server went down (commit: 6d62f9918ea[2]) on openjdk8. The
> > report is attached[3]. Note that the test has only run once on jdk8,
> > so the impact of single-test fluctuations is not ruled out.
> > Additionally, I have noticed some significant fluctuations in specific
> > tests when reviewing previous benchmark scores, which I have also
> > noted in the report. Taking all of these factors into consideration, I
> > think there is no obvious regression in release 1.18 *for now*. More
> > tests including the one on openjdk11 are on the way. Hope it does not
> > delay the release procedure.
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any concerns.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Zakelly
> >
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/2aeb99804ba56c008df0a1730f3246d3fea856b9
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/6d62f9918ea2cbb8a10c705a25a4ff6deab60711
> > [3]
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-3Y974jYq_WrQNzLN-y_6lOU-NGXaIDTQBYTZd04tJ0/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > The new environment for benchmark:
> > ECS on Aliyun
> > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8163 CPU @ 2.50GHz (8 Core available)
> > Memory: 64GB
> > OS: Alibaba Cloud Linux 3.2104 LTS 64bit
> > Kernel: 5.10.134-15.al8.x86_64
> > OpenJDK8 version: 1.8.0_372
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:04 PM Yuxin Tan <tanyuxinw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Zakelly,
> > >
> > > No benchmark tests currently are affected by this issue. We
> > > may add benchmarks to guard it later. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yuxin
> > >
> > >
> > > Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> 于2023年9月21日周四 11:56写道:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jing,
> > > >
> > > > Sure, I will run the benchmark with this fix.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Yunxin,
> > > >
> > > > I'm not familiar with the hybrid shuffle. Is there any specific
> > > > benchmark test that may be affected by this issue? I will pay special
> > > > attention to it.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Zakelly
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:08 AM Yuxin Tan <tanyuxinw...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, Jing, Qingsheng,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot.
> > > > > The fix has been backported.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Yuxin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年9月21日周四 00:42写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Lijie,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for reaching out. Please backport it to release-1.18.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Jing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 4:35 PM Lijie Wang <
> > wangdachui9...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi community and release managers:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We found a critical bug[1] of the rest client a few days ago,
> > which
> > > > may
> > > > > > > cause the inode to be used up. Now the fix-PR[2] is ready for
> > > > merging, I
> > > > > > > hope to backport it to release-1.18.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any concerns. Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32974
> > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23363
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Lijie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zakelly Lan <zakelly....@gmail.com> 于2023年9月19日周二 17:26写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Yuan and Jing,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I completely agree that
> > it is
> > > > our
> > > > > > > > top priority to ensure that there are no regressions from the
> > last
> > > > > > > > commit the previous benchmark pipeline covered to the final
> > commit
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > this release. I will try to get this result first.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Zakelly
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:55 PM Jing Ge
> > <j...@ververica.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks Zakelly and Yuan for your effort and update. Since we
> > > > changed
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > hardware, IMHO, if we are able to reach a consensus in the
> > > > community
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > there is no regression with the benchmarks, we could consider
> > > > > > releasing
> > > > > > > > rc1
> > > > > > > > > without waiting for the new baseline scores which might take
> > > > days.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:42 AM Yuan Mei <
> > > > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hey Zakelly,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks very much for the efforts to re-build the entire
> > > > benchmark
> > > > > > > > > > environment.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As long as we have
> > > > > > > > > > 1) the pipeline set up and ready (no need for the entire
> > portal
> > > > > > > ready),
> > > > > > > > > > 2) get benchmark comparison numbers (comparing with the
> > commit
> > > > just
> > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > the benchmark pipeline is down) and
> > > > > > > > > > 3) confirmed no-regression, it should be good enough.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks again!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best
> > > > > > > > > > Yuan
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:26 PM Zakelly Lan <
> > > > zakelly....@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am working on rebuilding the benchmark pipeline and
> > it's
> > > > almost
> > > > > > > > > > > done. However, due to the change in machines for
> > > > benchmarking, I
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > need a few more days to run tests and gather the baseline
> > > > scores
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > further comparison. Once the pipeline is fully ready, we
> > will
> > > > > > > proceed
> > > > > > > > > > > with the performance test for release 1.18.0.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any concerns. Thank you
> > all
> > > > for
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > patience.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > Zakelly
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 6:57 PM Jing Ge
> > > > > > <j...@ververica.com.invalid
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The RC0 for Apache Flink 1.18.0 has been created. This
> > RC
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > currently
> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > preview only to facilitate the integrated testing
> > since the
> > > > > > > > benchmark
> > > > > > > > > > > tests
> > > > > > > > > > > > are not available yet[1] and the release announcement
> > is
> > > > still
> > > > > > > > under
> > > > > > > > > > > > review. The RC1 will be released after all benchmarks
> > > > tests are
> > > > > > > > passed.
> > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > related voting process will be triggered once the
> > > > announcement
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > ready.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The RC0 has all the artifacts that we would typically
> > have
> > > > for
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > > > > > > except for the release note and the website pull
> > request
> > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > > announcement.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The following contents are available for your review:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - The preview source release and binary convenience
> > > > releases
> > > > > > [2],
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > > are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > > 96AE0E32CBE6E0753CE6
> > > > > > > [3].
> > > > > > > > > > > > - all artifacts that would normally be deployed to the
> > > > Maven
> > > > > > > > > > > > Central Repository [4].
> > > > > > > > > > > > - source code tag "release-1.18.0-rc0" [5]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Your help testing the release will be greatly
> > appreciated!
> > > > And
> > > > > > > > we'll
> > > > > > > > > > > > create the rc1 release and the voting thread as soon as
> > > > all the
> > > > > > > > efforts
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > finished.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33052
> > > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc0/
> > > > > > > > > > > > [3]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > > > [4]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1656/
> > > > > > > > > > > > [5]
> > > > > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.18.0-rc0
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Qingsheng, Sergei, Konstantin and Jing
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to