Hi Ryan! There is not really a Flink Kubernetes Operator team :) Everyone is welcome to contribute and bring new improvement and feature ideas!
Sounds like a valuable addition, I will assign the ticket to you (please comment on it so I can see your jira handle) so you can follow up with your PR. We are happy to help you with reviews, feedback etc. Cheers, Gyula On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 4:38 PM Ryan van Huuksloot <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Would the Flink Kubernetes Operator team be open to adding TLS to the > managed ingress? We have migrated to the operator but can't use the managed > ingress because there is no TLS support. At the same time I'd like to add a > label pass through mechanism, similar to the annotations. > > I've noticed there is an open issue, FLINK 33454 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33454> available but there > has > been no traction so I wanted to bring it up. > Some minor modifications to the issue. I think that `tls: > List<IngressTLSSpec>` would be better to support the kubernetes spec. And > `labels: Map<String, String>` to support label passthrough. > > We have an internal clone of the operator with a version of this being > tested > < > https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/compare/main...ryanvanhuuksloot:flink-kubernetes-operator:rvh.add-ingress-tls-spec > >, > it could be a good foundation for the open source. > > Happy to move the discussion to Jira. > > Ryan van Huuksloot > Sr. Production Engineer | Streaming Platform > [image: Shopify] > <https://www.shopify.com/?utm_medium=salessignatures&utm_source=hs_email> >
