Hi Sergey,
It looks like the issue we saw was a caused by a mismatch in our build levels,
so was a false negative; and is not an issue. We are testing with the latest
level of the branch now (the one compiled against 1.16).
Kind regards, David.
From: David Radley <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, 4 February 2024 at 22:50
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: Flink JDBC connector release
Hi Sergey,
Sorry for the typos. I meant:
Yes that is right, I am talking about the jdbc connector rc3 and Flink 1.18.
I am looking into finding a simple way to reproduce the issue, and will raise a
Jira if I can,
Kind regards, David.
From: Sergey Nuyanzin <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, 2 February 2024 at 19:46
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Flink JDBC connector release
Hi David
thanks for testing
I assume you are talking about jdbc connector rc3 and Flink 1.18.
In case you think there is a bug it would make sense to raise a jira issue
and provide steps to reproduce it
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 5:42 PM David Radley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been doing some testing on flink jdbc connector rc2. We are
> testing with Flink 1.1.8 jars and are using the TableEnvironment
> TableResult<
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/api/java/org/apache/flink/table/api/TableResult.html
> >
> executeSql(String<
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/String.html?is-external=true
> >
> statement). We hit some strange behaviour testing the lookup join, we got a
> null pointer Exception on
> https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/blob/390d7bc9139204fbfc48fe275a69eb60c4807fb5/flink-connector-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/jdbc/table/JdbcRowDataLookupFunction.java#L192
>
> and that the constructor did not seem to be driven. We changed the
> release that the pom file was building against to 1.18 and it works; so our
> issue appeared to be mismatching jar levels. This issue did not appear
> running the SQL client against rc2.
>
>
>
> I am attempting to put a simple java test together to show this issue.
>
>
>
> WDYT?
>
> Kind regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Unless otherwise stated above:
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
>
--
Best regards,
Sergey
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
