+1 (binding)

My only suggestion would be to move Catalog changes into a separate
interface to allow us to begin with lower stability guarantees. Existing
Catalogs would be able to opt-in by implementing it. It's a minor thing
though, overall the FLIP is solid and the direction is pretty exciting.

Best,
D.

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:31 AM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Hao,
> I don’t think this counts as an objection, I have some comments. I should
> have put this on the discussion thread earlier but have just got to this.
> - I suggest we can put a model version in the model resource. Versions are
> notoriously difficult to add later; I don’t think we want to proliferate
> differently named models as a model mutates. We may want to work with
> non-latest models.
> - I see that the model name is the unique identifier. I realise this would
> move away from the Oracle syntax – so may not be feasible short term; but I
> wonder if we can have:
>      - a uuid as the main identifier and the model name as an attribute.
> or
>      - a namespace (or something like a system of origin)
> to help organise models with the same name.
> - does the model have an owner? I assume that Flink model resource is the
> master of the model? I imagine in the future that a model that comes in via
> a new connector could be kept up to date with the external model and would
> not be allowed to be changed by anything other than the connector.
>
>    Kind regards, David.
>
> From: Hao Li <h...@confluent.io.INVALID>
> Date: Friday, 29 March 2024 at 16:30
> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] FLIP-437: Support ML Models in Flink SQL
> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-437: Support ML Models in Flink
> SQL [1]. The discussion thread is here [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or
> insufficient votes.
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-437%3A+Support+ML+Models+in+Flink+SQL
>
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/9z94m2bv4w265xb5l2mrnh4lf9m28ccn
>
> Thanks,
> Hao
>
> Unless otherwise stated above:
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
>

Reply via email to