Thank you all for the votes. Will close this thread and announce the
results in a separate email.

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:28 PM Sharath <dsaishar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:07 AM Ferenc Csaky <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Ferenc
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, June 19th, 2025 at 10:11, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Gyula
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 3:03 PM Etienne Chauchot echauc...@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > thanks for the updates Poorvank,
> > > >
> > > > LGTM. It is just missing 2 minor updates that we discsused:
> > > >
> > > > - the note about "the instantiation model is one
> CassandraRecordWriter
> > > > per subtask"
> > > >
> > > > - syncConfig variable name left in the example code (misleading as
> the
> > > > sink writes asynchronously)
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > >
> > > > Etienne
> > > >
> > > > Le 12/06/2025 à 11:55, Danny Cranmer a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for driving this, Poorvank,
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Danny
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 7:19 AM Poorvank Bhatia
> > puravbhat...@gmail.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a vote on FLIP-533: Cassandra Sink V2
> > > > > > <
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-533%3A+Cassandra+Sink+V2
> > > >
> > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > which has been discussed here
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8v7wlx23svvwzb9568fos8lkxobcty7y
> > and
> > > > > > > here
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/r8oo4y7djss9r06np6ddcx0ffwtjgdt5
> > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Will keep the voting open for at least 72 business hours unless
> > there
> > > > > > is an
> > > > > > objection or not enough votes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Poorvank
> >
>

Reply via email to