I think it would be good idea to have an auto applied "backport" label (if the target branch is not main and matches release-*).
Cheers, Tom Cooper @tomcooper.dev | https://tomcooper.dev On Wednesday, 13 August 2025 at 16:33, David Radley <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I have been reviewing PRs and notice that some titles of PRs in crude [BP-…] > to indicate that the PR is a back port. Other PRs just have the same title, > and it is not obvious as a reviewer whether the PR is a back port or a > duplicate. I was thinking that a label for non master targeted PRs to > indicate the version would help make back port PRs more obvious. I am happy > to implement this if the community agrees; this could be done pretty easily > in the existing community review github action, WDYT? > Kind regards, David. > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
