+1 (binding) 1. Verified the archives, checksums, and signatures 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries 3. Compiled and tested the source code via mvn install 4. Verified license files / headers
-Max On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 9:30 AM Gyula Fóra <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > - Verified source content, checksums, signatures > - Built from source > - Reviewed flink-web PR > - Tested basic functionality locally > > Cheers > Gyula > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 9:29 AM Gabor Somogyi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > - Verified versions in the poms > > - Built from source > > - Verified checksums and signatures > > - Started basic workload > > - Verified NOTICE and LICENSE files > > > > BR, > > G > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 8:21 AM Mate Czagany <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) - thanks for driving this release Ferenc! > > > > > > - Verified hashes and signatures > > > - Built from source and tests passed > > > - Checked that no binaries are found in the source distributions > > > - Ran a simple stateful job with Flink 2.1 with checkpoints/savepoints > > and > > > tested FlinkStateSnapshot functionality > > > - Tested structured YAML > > > - Tested upgrade from operator 1.12 > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Mate Czagany > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 5:44 PM Ferenc Csaky <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Max for raising this issue! > > > > > > > > I tend to agree with Gyula’s point — since 1.9.0 has already been out > > for > > > > quite > > > > a while, I wouldn’t consider this a release blocker on its own. It > > seems > > > > reasonable to postpone the fix to the subsequent release. > > > > > > > > But happy to reconsider if anybody else have a different opinion. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Ferenc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 18th, 2025 at 16:51, Gyula Fóra < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Max, it would be nice to hear what Ferenc thinks as he is > > > working > > > > on > > > > > the RCs. > > > > > > > > > > My recommendation would be to continue with the release verification > > > and > > > > > see if we find any issues/bugs that relate to the current release. > > > > > If we find other issues then we should create a new RC where we > > include > > > > > this fix too once it is merged. > > > > > > > > > > If everything else seems to be spotless then I think we can safely > > > > postpone > > > > > this to 1.13.1 or 1.14.0 whichever comes first :) > > > > > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:18 PM Maximilian Michels [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Gyula, > > > > > > > > > > > > Not exactly forever. The bug was first introduced by > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35328 which appears to > > > > > > have landed in the 1.9.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Still, it is a relatively easy fix. If the community thinks it is > > not > > > > > > worth fixing, we can postpone the fix to the next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Max > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Gyula Fóra [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Max! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not sure if we should cancel the RC for this issue, this has been > > > > there > > > > > > > forever and the dynamic kafka source generally has a pretty > > limited > > > > user > > > > > > > base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:54 PM Maximilian Michels > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much for creating the release! Unfortunately, I've > > > > just > > > > > > > > found an issue: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38381 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully, the new RC isn't too much work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Max > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:57 PM Ferenc Csaky > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the > > > > version > > > > > > > > > 1.13.0 of Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator, > > > > > > > > > as follows: > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific > > > > comments) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Release Overview > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As an overview, the release consists of the following: > > > > > > > > > a) Kubernetes Operator canonical source distribution > > (including > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Dockerfile), to be deployed to the release repository at > > > > > > > > > dist.apache.org > > > > > > > > > b) Kubernetes Operator Helm Chart to be deployed to the > > release > > > > > > > > > repository at dist.apache.org > > > > > > > > > c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central > > > Repository > > > > > > > > > d) Docker image to be pushed to DockerHub > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Staging Areas to Review > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The staging areas containing the above mentioned artifacts > > are > > > as > > > > > > > > > follows, for your review: > > > > > > > > > * All artifacts for a,b) can be found in the corresponding > > dev > > > > > > > > > repository at dist.apache.org [1] > > > > > > > > > * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus > > > > Repository > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > * The docker image for d) is staged on github [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All artifacts are signed with the key 16AE0DDBBB2F380B [4] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Other links for your review: > > > > > > > > > * JIRA release notes [5] > > > > > > > > > * source code tag "release-1.13.0-rc1" [6] > > > > > > > > > * PR to update the website Downloads page to include > > Kubernetes > > > > > > > > > Operator > > > > > > > > > links [7] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vote Duration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The voting time will run for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC > > > > affirmative > > > > > > > > > votes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note on Verification > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can follow the basic verification guide here [8]. > > > > > > > > > Note that you don't need to verify everything yourself, but > > > > please > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > note of what you have tested together with your +- vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Ferenc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.13.0-rc1/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1844/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:b40c553 > > > > > > > > > [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > > > > > > > [5] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12355967 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [6] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/tree/release-1.13.0-rc1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/805 > > > > > > > > > [8] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Verifying+a+Flink+Kubernetes+Operator+Release > > > > > > > > >
