Hi Shengkai,

I agree that a page_token would work better so you can properly handle
pagination. If we are open to adjusting the Catalog API enough to optimize
so we can support page_tokens - and we would need to build a special rest
endpoint for this into (likely) the SQL Gateway.

Do you feel similarly about passing the LIKE/ILIKE through to the Catalog
API?

Ryan van Huuksloot
Staff Engineer, Infrastructure | Streaming Platform
[image: Shopify]
<https://www.shopify.com/?utm_medium=salessignatures&utm_source=hs_email>


On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 12:01 AM Shengkai Fang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ryan.
>
> I am not sure it's a good idea to expose limit clause in the SHOW
> statements. As far as I know, many systems uses jdbc or client to list
> paged tables or views. For example, jdbc supports to list tables via
> DatabaseMetadata and ResultSet and databricks allow users to list paged
> tables using REST API[1]. I prefer to align the behaviour with databricks
> using special REST API and Catalog API to support this feature.
>
> [1] https://docs.databricks.com/api/workspace/tables/list#page_token
>
> Best,
> Shengkai
>
> Sriram Ganesh <[email protected]> 于2025年9月24日周三 13:47写道:
>
> > *Sriram G*
> > *Tech*
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Sept 2025, 09:55 Ryan van Huuksloot,
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > I think it would be useful to add a LIMIT syntax with SHOW queries. Or
> > have
> > > some sort of ability to show a subset of tables.
> > >
> > > It would be incredibly useful when working with catalogs that have
> > hundreds
> > > of databases and thousands of tables. In most cases folks want a
> > responsive
> > > UI and would prefer to click "load more" than wait a really long time.
> > >
> > > I would propose that the default behaviour remains but the additional
> > > syntax is passed as a new set of overloaded methods in the Catalog. I'd
> > > like to push this limit to the Catalog so the Catalog can decide if it
> > > should filter before or after "loading" all of the objects.
> > >
> > > What do folks think?
> > >
> > > I think this will likely require a FLIP since it is quite a large
> change
> > to
> > > the SQL Gateway and Catalog.
> > >
> > > (Similarly, I think it would be useful to offer the ability to push the
> > > LIKE predicate down to the Catalog. Therefore the developer can
> optimize
> > > the code if there is a predicate. Currently we do this after the rows
> are
> > > returned.)
> > >
> > > Ryan van Huuksloot
> > > Staff Engineer, Infrastructure | Streaming Platform
> > > [image: Shopify]
> > > <
> https://www.shopify.com/?utm_medium=salessignatures&utm_source=hs_email
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to