Hi there,
It would be useful in the motivation to explicitly describe the value of the
different options and the use cases that would drive the need for each of these
permutations and all best practises. Can the autoscaler work out automatically
which of these to use?
Kind regards, David.
From: Dennis-Mircea Ciupitu <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 15 April 2026 at 08:14
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX: Composable Parallelism Alignment Modes
for Flink Autoscaler
Hi all,
[Sorry for reposting. I noticed the title in the previous message wasn’t
correct, so I’m sharing the updated version here.]
I’d like to start a discussion on FLIP-XXX: Composable Parallelism
Alignment Modes for Flink Autoscaler [1].
I’ve also opened a draft PR with a reference implementation to make the
proposal concrete and easier to review [2].
Feedback and suggestions are very welcome.
Best regards,
Dennis
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IbvKspt5jjjqiXl_CeHgI8EBn8LP-Pw0t7LqF85yFRw/edit?usp=sharing
[2] https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/1088
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road,
Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
