Thanks for driving this! +1(non-binding)
Best, Gen On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 9:10 AM Lincoln Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > +1(binding) > > > Best, > Lincoln Lee > > > Kui Yuan <[email protected]> 于2026年6月4日周四 10:55写道： > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote on FLIP-580: AsyncTableFunction supports > > user-defined timeout handling logic. > > > > The FLIP proposal allow users to define custom timeout handling logic > > inside AsyncTableFunction. An increasing number of users are > > leveraging AsyncTableFunction to invoke remote inference clusters. > > Such invocations are essentially remote inference requests, which are > > far more prone to timeouts than regular I/O operations. Users expect > > to be able to define custom handling logic when a timeout occurs — for > > example, falling back to default data or accumulating failure > > statistics — rather than having a TimeoutException thrown directly and > > causing the entire job to fail. > > > > FLIP: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-580%3A+AsyncTableFunction+supports+user-defined+timeout+handling+logic > > > > Discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nv5vvmqwgzjq14fzwb63nos5t3xgq4fz > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > objection or insufficient votes. > > > > Thanks, > > Kui.Yuan > > >
