Hi, Ferenc Csaky.

Thanks so much for your feedback.

Attached[1] is our earlier discussion on version numbering—it might help
clarify part
of your question and provide some historical context around this release.
The email[1] focuses primarily on version naming and continuity,
rather than compatibility (likely because maintaining sequential
version numbers mitigates most backward-compatibility risks).

[1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/4jr8h98qr67l9wx8770sq8c0r44zpk1y

Best regards,
Yuepeng Pan


Ferenc Csaky <[email protected]> 于2026年6月25日周四 22:41写道:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for driving this!
>
> I see that every Flink minor version will have a major connector version.
> Do we
> have any specific reason to do so? The different versions ship backward-
> incompatible changes between those Flink versions? Otherwise I do not see a
> reason to do this, that's why I'm asking.
>
> Best,
> Ferenc
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 25th, 2026 at 02:52, 주수민 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dev,
> >
> > This is a progress update and plan sync for the upcoming
> > flink-connector-jdbc releases
> > targeting the following versions:
> >
> > [1] jdbc-3.4.0 (for Flink 1.20)
> > [2] jdbc-5.0.0 (for Flink 2.1)
> > [3] jdbc-6.0.0 (for Flink 2.2)
> >
> > We have reviewed and merged critical, high-priority PRs, and we are now
> > moving forward
> > to build the RC (Release Candidate) in the next phase.
> >
> > [Progress]
> >
> >    1. Jira version tags have been created (jdbc-3.4.0, jdbc-3.5.0,
> >    jdbc-5.0.0, jdbc-6.0.0).
> >    Note: jdbc-3.5.0 is prepared as a reserve version to accommodate
> >    potential follow-up
> >    patches after the initial jdbc-3.4.0 release, if needed.
> >    2. The major feature patch (PR #180 [4]) has been merged.
> >    3. PR #198 [5] was submitted as a follow-up to the stale PR #174[6]
> >    (FLINK-38046).
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33463?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20jdbc-3.4.0
> > [2]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33463?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20jdbc-5.0.0
> > [3]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39974?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20jdbc-6.0.0
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/180
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/198
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/174
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sumin Joo
> >
>

Reply via email to