What did Spark use instead of fastutil?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > A word of caution -- fastutil is a massive library, 20MB or so and 10K > files if I recall correctly. It was pulled out of Spark just because > it was making the deployment jars huge (and wasn't used much). Make > sure it's worth it. > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Robert Waury > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Okay, > > > > I'm going to add fastutil to the dependencies in my next pull request. > > > > Cheers, > > Robert > > On Jun 20, 2014 8:52 AM, "Sebastian Schelter" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 for fastutils > >> > >> > >> On 06/20/2014 08:50 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Robert, > >>> > >>> The Apache Commons Primitives Collection project seems to be pretty > >>> inactive. The last release was in 2003, there are many dead links on > the > >>> website. I would not suggest to use it. > >>> HPPC and fastutil seem pretty similar to me. Both have a somewhat > active > >>> mailing list and up-to-date releases. Apache Giraph is using fastutil. > >>> In my opinion, its up to you to decide what you want to use. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Robert Waury < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I'm currently working on some code in Flink's runtime and want to use > >>>> some > >>>> Java Primitive Collections to improve performance. > >>>> > >>>> As fas as I can see no Primitive Collections library is in the > >>>> dependencies > >>>> so I wanted to ask if anybody has any preferences or input on which > >>>> library > >>>> the project should use. > >>>> > >>>> The viable candidates (from a licensing perspective at least) are: > >>>> > >>>> - Apache Commons Primitives Collections > >>>> - High Performance Primitives Collections for Java (HPPC) > >>>> - fastutil > >>>> > >>>> They are all APL 2.0 licensed. > >>>> > >>>> Since I'm probably not the only one who is going to use Primitive > >>>> Collections I don't want to introduce a new dependency without any > >>>> discussion. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Robert > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> >
