I will port PiEstimation now that generateSequence is in, as well as TPC-H Q3
Kostas On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > I added the PageRank example, thanks again fabian. :D > > Regarding the other stuff: > - There is a comment in DataSet.scala about including > org.apache.flink.api.scala._ because of the TypeInformation. > - I added generateSequence to ExecutionEnvironment. > - It is possible to use Scala Primitives in Array, I noticed it while > writing the tests, you probably had an older version of the code. > - Yes, using List and other Interfaces is not possible, this is also > a restriction in the Java API. > > What do you think about the interface of join and coGroup? Right now, > you can either use a lambda that returns an Option or the lambda with > the Collector. Originally I wanted to have also have a lambda that > returns a Collection, but due to type erasure this has the same type > as the lambda with the Option so I couldn't use it. There is an > implicit conversion from Option to a Collection, so I could change it > without breaking the examples we have now. What do you think? > > So far we have ported: WordCount, KMeans, ConnectedComponents, > WebLogAnalysis, TransitiveClosureNaive, TriangleEnumerationNaive/Opt, > PageRank > > These are the examples people called dibs on: > - BatchGradientDescent (Márton) (Should be a port of LinearRegression > Example from Java) > - ComputeEdgeDegrees (Hermann) > > Those are unclaimed (if I'm not mistaken): > - The relational Stuff > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 for removing RelationQuery > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> By the way, what was called BatchGradientDescent in the Scala examples > >> should be replaced by a port of the LinearRegression Example from > >> Java. I had them as two separate examples earlier. > >> > >> What about RelationalQuery and TPC-H-Q3. Any thoughts about removing > >> RelationalQuery? > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >> > I added the Triangle Enumeration Examples, thanks Fabian. > >> > > >> > So far we have ported: WordCount, KMeans, ConnectedComponents, > >> > WebLogAnalysis, TransitiveClosureNaive, TriangleEnumerationNaive/Opt > >> > > >> > These are the examples people called dibs on: > >> > - PageRank (Fabian) > >> > - BatchGradientDescent (Márton) > >> > - ComputeEdgeDegrees (Hermann) > >> > > >> > Those are unclaimed (if I'm not mistaken): > >> > - The relational Stuff > >> > - LinearRegression > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> >> Thanks, I added it. I'll keep a running list of ported/unported > >> >> examples in my mails. I'll rename the java example package to > examples > >> >> once the Scala API merge is done. > >> >> > >> >> I think the termination criterion is fine as it is. Just because > Scala > >> >> enables functional programming doesn't mean it's always the best > >> >> choice. :D > >> >> > >> >> So far we have ported: WordCount, KMeans, ConnectedComponents, > >> >> WebLogAnalysis, TransitiveClosureNaive > >> >> > >> >> These are the examples people called dibs on: > >> >> - TriangleEnumration and PageRank (Fabian) > >> >> - BatchGradientDescent (Márton) > >> >> - ComputeEdgeDegrees (Hermann) > >> >> > >> >> Those are unclaimed (if I'm not mistaken): > >> >> - The relational Stuff > >> >> - LinearRegression > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Aljoscha > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >> >>> Transitive closure here, I also added a termination criterion in the > >> Java > >> >>> version: > >> https://github.com/ktzoumas/incubator-flink/tree/tc-scala-example > >> >>> > >> >>> Perhaps you can make the termination criterion in Scala more > >> functional? > >> >>> > >> >>> I noticed that the examples package name is example.java but > >> examples.scala > >> >>> > >> >>> Kostas > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'll take TransitiveClosure and PiEstimation (was not on your > list). > >> >>>> > >> >>>> If nobody volunteers for the relational stuff I can take those as > >> well. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> How about removing the "RelationalQuery" from both Scala and Java? > It > >> >>>> seems to be a proper subset of TPC-H Q3. Does it add some teaching > >> value on > >> >>>> top of TPC-H Q3? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Kostas > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org > >> > > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks, I added it, along with an ITCase. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> So far we have ported: WordCount, KMeans, ConnectedComponents, > >> >>>>> WebLogAnalysis > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> These are the examples people called dibs on: > >> >>>>> - TriangleEnumration and PageRank (Fabian) > >> >>>>> - BatchGradientDescent (Márton) > >> >>>>> - ComputeEdgeDegrees (Hermann) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Those are unclaimed (if I'm not mistaken): > >> >>>>> - TransitiveClosure > >> >>>>> - The relational Stuff > >> >>>>> - LinearRegression > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Cheers, > >> >>>>> Aljoscha > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Kostas Tzoumas < > ktzou...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > WebLog here: > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> > https://github.com/ktzoumas/incubator-flink/tree/webloganalysis-example-scala > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > Do you need any more done? > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > >> aljos...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> > wrote: > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> >> I added the ConnectedComponents Example from Vasia. > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> Keep 'em coming, people. :D > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Fabian Hueske < > fhue...@apache.org > >> > > >> >>>>> >> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> > Alright, will do. > >> >>>>> >> > Thanks! > >> >>>>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> > 2014-09-08 17:48 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek < > >> aljos...@apache.org>: > >> >>>>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> Ok people, executive decision. :D > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> Please look at KMeansData.java and KMeans.scala. I'm storing > >> the > >> >>>>> >> >> data > >> >>>>> >> >> in multi-dimensional object arrays and then converting it to > >> the > >> >>>>> >> >> required Java or Scala objects. > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> Also, I changed isEqualTo to equalTo to make it consistent > >> with the > >> >>>>> >> >> Java > >> >>>>> >> >> API. > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> Regarding Join (and coGroup). There is no need for a > keyword, > >> you > >> >>>>> >> >> can > >> >>>>> >> >> just write: > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> left.join(right).where(0).equalTo(1) { (le, re) => new > >> MyResult(le, > >> >>>>> >> >> re) > >> >>>>> >> } > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Fabian Hueske < > >> fhue...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> >> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> > Aside from the DataSet issue, I also found an > inconsistency > >> with > >> >>>>> >> >> > the > >> >>>>> >> Java > >> >>>>> >> >> > API. In Java join is done as: > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> > ds1.join(ds2).where(...).equalTo(...) > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> > where in the current Scala this is: > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> > ds1.join(d2).where(...).isEqualTo(...) > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> > isEqualTo() should be renamed to equalTo(), IMO. > >> >>>>> >> >> > Also, join (+cross and coGroup?) lacks the with() method > >> because > >> >>>>> >> "with" > >> >>>>> >> >> is > >> >>>>> >> >> > a keyword in Scala. Should be offer something similar for > >> Scala > >> >>>>> >> >> > or go > >> >>>>> >> >> with > >> >>>>> >> >> > map() on Tuple2(left, right)? > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> > 2014-09-08 13:51 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org > >: > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> Instead of Strings, Object[][] would work as well. That > is a > >> >>>>> >> >> >> generic > >> >>>>> >> >> >> representation of a Tuple. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> Alternatively, they could be stored as Java or Scala > Tuples, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> with a > >> >>>>> >> >> generic > >> >>>>> >> >> >> utility method to convert between the two. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fabian Hueske > >> >>>>> >> >> >> <fhue...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> >> >> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > Yeah, I ran into the same problem... > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > +1 for using Strings and parsing them, but using the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > CSVFormat > >> >>>>> >> won't > >> >>>>> >> >> >> work > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > because this is based on a FileInputFormat. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > So we would need to parse the Strings manually... > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > 2014-09-08 10:35 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > <aljos...@apache.org>: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > Hi, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > on second thought. Maybe we should just change all > the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > example > >> >>>>> >> input > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > data to strings and use CSV input formats in all the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > examples. > >> >>>>> >> What > >> >>>>> >> >> do > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > you think? > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > Cheers, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > Aljoscha > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > >> >>>>> >> >> aljos...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > Hi, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > yes it's unfortunate that the data types are > >> incompatible. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > I'm > >> >>>>> >> >> afraid > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > you have to to what you proposed: move the data to > a > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > static > >> >>>>> >> field > >> >>>>> >> >> and > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > convert it in the getDefaultEdgeDataSet() method in > >> Scala. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > It's > >> >>>>> >> >> not > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > nice, but copying would duplicate the data and > make it > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > easier > >> >>>>> >> for > >> >>>>> >> >> it > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > to go out of sync in the Java and Scala versions. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > What do the others think? This will probably occur > in > >> all > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> examples. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > Cheers, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > Aljoscha > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> Hey, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> I have ported the Connected Components example, > but > >> I am > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> not > >> >>>>> >> sure > >> >>>>> >> >> >> how > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > to > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> reuse the example input data from java-examples. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> In the ConnectedComponentsData class, the vertices > >> and > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> edges > >> >>>>> >> data > >> >>>>> >> >> >> are > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> produced by the methods getDefaultVertexDataSet() > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> and getDefaultEdgeDataSet(), which take > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> an org.apache.flink.api.java.ExecutionEnvironment > as > >> >>>>> >> parameter. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> One way is to provide public static fields (like > in > >> the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> WordCountData > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> class), but this introduces a conversion > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> from org.apache.flink.api.java.tuple.Tuple2 to > Scala > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> tuple and > >> >>>>> >> >> from > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> java.lang.Long to scala.Long and I guess this is > an > >> >>>>> >> unnecessary > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > complexity > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> for an example (?). > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> Another way is, of course, to copy the example > data > >> in > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> the > >> >>>>> >> Scala > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > example. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> Am I missing something here? > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> Thanks! > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> Cheers, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> V. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> On 5 September 2014 15:52, Aljoscha Krettek < > >> >>>>> >> aljos...@apache.org > >> >>>>> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> Alright, I updated my repo: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> https://github.com/aljoscha/incubator-flink/commits/scala-rework > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> This now has a working WordCount example. It's > >> pretty > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> much a > >> >>>>> >> >> copy > >> >>>>> >> >> >> of > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> the Java example with some fixups for the syntax > and > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> lambda > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > functions. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> You'll also notice that I added the java-examples > >> as a > >> >>>>> >> >> dependency > >> >>>>> >> >> >> for > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> the scala-examples. I did this to reuse the > example > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> input > >> >>>>> >> data. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> When you ported a program you can do a pull > request > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> against > >> >>>>> >> my > >> >>>>> >> >> repo > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> and I will collect the examples. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> Happy coding. :D > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Hermann Gábor < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> reckone...@gmail.com > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > +1 > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > ComputeEdgeDegrees for me! > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Márton > Balassi < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> +1 > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> BatchGradientDescent for me :) > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Kostas > Tzoumas < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > ktzou...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > +1 > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > I go for WebLogAnalysis. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > My experience with Scala consists of going > >> through > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > a > >> >>>>> >> >> tutorial > >> >>>>> >> >> >> so > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > this > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> will > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > be a good stress test both for me and the > new > >> API > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > :-) > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Vasiliki > >> Kalavri < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > +1 for having other people implement the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > examples! > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > Connected Components and Kmeans for me :) > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > -V. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > On 4 September 2014 21:03, Fabian Hueske < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> fhue...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > I go for TriangleEnumeration and > PageRank. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > Let's also do the examples similar to > the > >> Java > >> >>>>> >> >> examples: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > - running out-of-the-box without > parameters > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > - parameters for external data > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > - follow a similar code structure > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > 2014-09-04 20:56 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha > >> Krettek < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > aljos...@apache.org > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > Will do, then people can reserve their > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > favourite > >> >>>>> >> >> >> examples > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > here. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Fabian > >> Hueske > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> fhue...@apache.org> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > wrote: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > Hi, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > I think having examples implemented > by > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > different > >> >>>>> >> >> >> people > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> proved to > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > be > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > valuable in the past. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > I'd help with two or three examples. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > It might be helpful if you'd port a > >> simple > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > first > >> >>>>> >> >> one > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > such > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > as > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > WordCount. > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > Fabian > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > 2014-09-04 18:47 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha > >> Krettek > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > < > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> aljos...@apache.org > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> Hi, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> I have a working rewrite of the > Scala > >> API > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> here: > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > >> https://github.com/aljoscha/incubator-flink/commits/scala-rework > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> I'm hoping that I'll only have to > >> write > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> the > >> >>>>> >> tests > >> >>>>> >> >> and > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > port > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> examples. Do you think it makes > sense > >> to > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> let > >> >>>>> >> other > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > people > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> port > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> the > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> examples, so that someone else uses > >> it and > >> >>>>> >> maybe > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > notices > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > some > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > quirks > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> in the API? > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> Cheers, > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> Aljoscha > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >>> > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > > >> >>>>> >> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >
