+1

I tested the candidate on our cluster again.

-- Robert (from my mobile)

> On 21.10.2014, at 18:05, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> verified source and bin NOTICE and LICENSE
> ran examples on cluster
> ran examples in local mode
> 
> +1
> 
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Signature files look good
>> Checksum files look good
>> NOTICE and LICENSE files look good
>> No 3rd party executables in source artifact
>> Source compile and tests passed
>> Run simple example in standalone.
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> 
>> - Henry
>> 
>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
>>> (incubating) version 0.7.0
>>> 
>>> This release will be the second major release for Flink in the incubator.
>>> 
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The commit to be voted on is in the branch "release-0.7.0-rc2" (commit
>>> cf4c6e7077fa4c3e3d96758b2f563ec17148a786):
>>> *http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-flink/commit/cf4c6e70
>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-flink/commit/cf4c6e70
>>> *
>>> 
>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>>> *http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-0.7.0-incubating-rc2/
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-0.7.0-incubating-rc2/>*
>>> 
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/rmetzger.asc
>>> 
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1016
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.7.0 (incubating).
>>> 
>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least
>>> three +1 PPMC votes are cast.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.7.0 (incubating)
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> 

Reply via email to