If you use a process like what is documented at 
https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests would patches even be 
necessary?  I would hope that the review board could handle just using the 
GitHub tools at the very least.

Ralph

On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Hari Shreedharan wrote:

> Ralph, 
> 
> Yes, review board does integrate with git pretty well. As of now, there is a 
> repo called flume-git on review board which you need to select to submit a 
> git generated patch. In fact, if we use git, we don't need to select the base 
> folder etc(as we do for an svn patch), simply uploading the patch is enough.
> 
> Hari 
> 
> -- 
> Hari Shreedharan
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> 
>> Does the review tool integrate with git? By that I mean will patches still 
>> need to be added to the review tool or is it capable of figuring out the 
>> differences on its own if the enhancement/fix is on a "branch" (or fork or 
>> whatever it is that git calls it). If so, this would make RTC much more user 
>> friendly.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>> On Jul 10, 2012, at 11:55 PM, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all, 
>>> 
>>> Apache infra is now allowing projects to choose git as the primary source 
>>> control, if the project community choose so. I have been using git svn for 
>>> commits and git to maintain my repo, but recently there have been issues 
>>> with the git-svn sync (earlier git mirror had substantial delays - but now 
>>> it looks like it is missing commits).
>>> 
>>> I would like to know how many of you would be interested in such a move, to 
>>> host Flume as wip git repo at Apache. Please note that this is not meant to 
>>> be a comparison of git and svn, this is just a discussion to gauge the 
>>> community's interest in using git as the primary source control.
>>> 
>>> Also, please note that I have not communicated this with ASF Infra about 
>>> this, and I am not exactly sure how the move would work. I will work on 
>>> that if there is sufficient interest within the community.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to