On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:38 AM, Mike Percy wrote: > Right now, I feel we would get most of the bang for the buck simply by > adding two annotations: @Public and @Internal, which to me means "you can > subclass or instantiate this directly", or "you can't directly use this if > you expect future compatibility".
Why not keep the same nomenclature as in Hadoop? It will help keeping some sort of commonality in the ecosystem? Arun
