----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6982/#review12089 -----------------------------------------------------------
flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MemoryChannel.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/6982/#comment25766> Semaphores and synchronized/monitors are essentially different ways of achieving the same goal. The only difference is that when you have permits > 1, semaphores are much better since each semaphore operation is atomic and you don't need to worry about handling thread context switches happening in between. Also in Java, traditionally java.util.concurrent.* classes have been implemented more efficiently than the language constructs themselves - though this seems to be fading over time, as synchornized/wait/notify have been getting better. - Hari Shreedharan On Sept. 16, 2012, 3:54 a.m., Ted Malaska wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6982/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 16, 2012, 3:54 a.m.) > > > Review request for Flume. > > > Description > ------- > > 1. The user will be able to define a byteCapacity and a > byteCapacityBufferPercentage. > 2. Events byte size will be estimated from there body contents > 3. On put bytes are added to current total > 4. On commit any uncommitted takes are removed from the current byte total > 5. On rollover any uncommitted puts are removed from the current byte total > > > This addresses bug FLUME-1535. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1535 > > > Diffs > ----- > > flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/MemoryChannel.java > c72e97c > flume-ng-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/channel/TestMemoryChannel.java > e070864 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6982/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Ted Malaska > >
