[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patrick Wendell updated FLUME-1425:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: FLUME-1425.v6.patch.txt
Adding another patch which addresses several comments form Mike Percy.
> Create a SpoolDirectory Source and Client
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLUME-1425
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1425
> Project: Flume
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Patrick Wendell
> Assignee: Patrick Wendell
> Attachments: FLUME-1425.avro-conf-file.txt, FLUME-1425.patch.v1.txt,
> FLUME-1425.v5.patch.txt, FLUME-1425.v6.patch.txt
>
>
> The proposal is to create a small executable client which reads logs from a
> spooling directory and sends them to a flume sink, then performs cleanup on
> the directory (either by deleting or moving the logs). It would make the
> following assumptions
> - Files placed in the directory are uniquely named
> - Files placed in the directory are immutable
> The problem this is trying to solve is that there is currently no way to do
> guaranteed event delivery across flume agent restarts when the data is being
> collected through an asynchronous source (and not directly from the client
> API). Say, for instance, you are using a exec("tail -F") source. If the agent
> restarts due to error or intentionally, tail may pick up at a new location
> and you lose the intermediate data.
> At the same time, there are users who want at-least-once semantics, and
> expect those to apply as soon as the data is written to disk from the initial
> logger process (e.g. apache logs), not just once it has reached a flume
> agent. This idea would bridge that gap, assuming the user is able to copy
> immutable logs to a spooling directory through a cron script or something.
> The basic internal logic of such a client would be as follows:
> - Scan the directory for files
> - Chose a file and read through, while sending events to an agent
> - Close the file and delete it (or rename, or otherwise mark completed)
> That's about it. We could add sync-points to make recovery more efficient in
> the case of failure.
> A key question is whether this should be implemented as a standalone client
> or as a source. My instinct is actually to do this as a source, but there
> could be some benefit to not requiring an entire agent in order to run this,
> specifically that it would become platform independent and you could stick it
> on Windows machines. Others I have talked to have also sided on a standalone
> executable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
