+1 for Flume 1.4 +1 for Mike being RM
-Mubarak On May 22, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Venkatesh S R <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for both! Thanks Mike! > > Best, > Venkatesh > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Will McQueen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for Flume 1.4 >> +1 for Mike being RM. >> >> On May 22, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Edward Sargisson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> +1/+1 for 1.4 and Mike. >>> >>> >>> I'm very keen to have a 1.4 for the environments I manage. There's a lot >> of >>> stuff I'm keen on in there. >>> >>> On my pre-1.4 list: >>> 1. compile with elasticsearch 0.90 >>> 2. figure out file channel state issue which is stopping Flume logging >> via >>> itself. >>> >>> 1. Currently we compile with es 0.19. If somebody wants to run es 0.20 >> they >>> have to recompile (es made an interface change that is source compatible >>> but requires a recompile). es 0.90 has been out for 2-ish weeks so safe >>> enough to change the compile to. I think I'll raise an empty Jira to >> record >>> this. >>> >>> 2. I haven't reported this because I haven't isolated it well enough. I'm >>> having issues with the 1.3.1 file channel which I'd like to resolve. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Edward >>> >>> "Hi folks, >>> We have had over 100 commits since 1.3.1, and a bunch of new features and >>> improvements including a Thrift source, much improved ElasticSearch sink, >>> support for a new plugins directory and layout, compression support in >> the >>> avro sink/source, improved checkpointing in the file channel and more, >> plus >>> a lot of bug fixes. >>> >>> It seems to me that it's time to start thinking about cutting a 1.4 >>> release. I would be happy to volunteer to RM the release. Worth noting >> that >>> I will be unavailable for the next two weeks... but after that I'd be >> happy >>> to pick this up and run with it. That's also a decent amount of time for >>> people to get moving on patches and reviews for their favorite features, >>> bug fixes, etc. >>> >>> If this all sounds OK, I'd like to suggest targeting the last week of >> June >>> as a release date. If we can release in time for Hadoop Summit then that >>> would be pretty nice. Otherwise, if something comes up and we can't get >> the >>> release out that week, let's shoot for the first week of July at the >> latest. >>> >>> Please let me know your thoughts. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mike >>> >>> +1 for Flume 1.4 >>> +1 for Mike being RM. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Hari" >>
