[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14166528#comment-14166528
 ] 

Santiago M. Mola commented on FLUME-2474:
-----------------------------------------

I was building against hadoop-1 profile. I'm now building against all profiles. 
I'll try to come up with a general solution.

> TestHDFSEventSinkOnMiniCluster fails if user umask is not 0022
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLUME-2474
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2474
>             Project: Flume
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Sinks+Sources
>    Affects Versions: v1.5.0.1, v1.6.0
>            Reporter: Santiago M. Mola
>            Assignee: Santiago M. Mola
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: patch
>             Fix For: v1.6.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0003-Ensure-proper-file-permissions-on-TestHDFSEventSinkO.patch
>
>
> MiniDFSCluster requires DFS_DIR to have rwxr-x-r-x permissions recursively. 
> That is usually achieved by having umask set to 0022, but that's not 
> convenient for tests. I'm attaching a patch to solve the problem using 
> setfacl.
> Here's the error log:
> Running org.apache.flume.sink.hdfs.TestHDFSEventSinkOnMiniCluster
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 10.23 sec <<< 
> FAILURE!
> simpleHDFSTest(org.apache.flume.sink.hdfs.TestHDFSEventSinkOnMiniCluster)  
> Time elapsed: 9473 sec  <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster.startDataNodes(MiniDFSCluster.java:422)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster.<init>(MiniDFSCluster.java:280)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster.<init>(MiniDFSCluster.java:124)
>       at 
> org.apache.flume.sink.hdfs.TestHDFSEventSinkOnMiniCluster.simpleHDFSTest(TestHDFSEventSinkOnMiniCluster.java:85)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to