We should choose which ever is the easiest to do I guess (Sqoop method or HBase method).
Thanks, Hari On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Roshan Naik <ros...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > FWIWŠ From what I recollect, Hbase did this when they started supporting > hadoop1&2. Not sure if its still the same method they use.. > - their default pom had the artifacts named for hadoop1 binaries > - they had a shell script to produce a modified pom ..with -hadoop2 suffix > for the artifact names > - they built and published the hadoop2 binaries using the modified pom, > and hadoop1 binaries form the original pom > -roshan > On 4/1/15 1:24 PM, "Hari Shreedharan" <hshreedha...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>I know sqoop2 does it. Maybe Jarcec can help? >> >> >> >> >>Thanks, Hari >> >>On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Roshan Naik <ros...@hortonworks.com> >>wrote: >> >>> To push artifacts for both hadoop2 and hadoop1 will need to name the >>> hadoop2 and hadoop1 artifacts differently. Tricky to do that with one >>>pom >>> I think. >>> -roshan >>> On 4/1/15 1:05 PM, "Hari Shreedharan" <hshreedha...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>>>I am a +1 for doing this, since this is the last JDK 6 release. Maybe we >>>>should push artifacts for both Hadoop-1 and hbase-98 profiles this time >>>>and switch out to Hadoop 2 exclusively from 1.7? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Thanks, Hari >>>> >>>>On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Roshan Naik <ros...@hortonworks.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Don't recall if this has been discussed before. Its been sometime >>>>>since >>>>>hadoop2 has been out. >>>>> Sooner or later Flume will switch to hadoop2 based builds (hbase98 >>>>>profile?) as the default. Not sure if 1.6 is the time or worth waiting >>>>>longer. >>>>> -roshan
