[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14967973#comment-14967973 ]
Ralph Goers commented on FLUME-2632: ------------------------------------ I am now running this in production in my environment and it works just fine. I'd be happy to commit it but that seems a bit strange since I didn't author it and wasn't part of the review. > High CPU on KafkaSink > --------------------- > > Key: FLUME-2632 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2632 > Project: Flume > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Sinks+Sources > Affects Versions: v1.5.1 > Reporter: Gwen Shapira > Assignee: Gwen Shapira > Labels: kafka > Fix For: v1.6.0 > > Attachments: FLUME-2632-0.patch > > > Reported here: https://github.com/harishreedharan/flume/issues/1 > "I tried flume-ng-kafka-sink and it worked fine. But I noticed that the cpu > utilization stay at 100% and never dropped down all the time even at the time > the channel is empty. > I looked into the source code and found that "process" function in KafkaSink > always return Status.READY even if no events available in channel. That > causes the SinkRunner keep running achieving event from channel and get > nothing. > Do we need to change to return Status.BACKOFF in "process" function in > KafkaSink when it notices that there is no events processed in current round? > So that the SinkRunner has a chance to take a rest when there is no event in > channel. If this proposal feasible, function "testEmptyChannel" in > TestKafkaSink also need to be changed. " -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)