[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15529354#comment-15529354
]
Umesh Chaudhary commented on FLUME-2894:
----------------------------------------
Wondering if we can achieve this by current data structures used in
LifecycleSupervisor class. We are using HashMap as:
supervisedProcesses = new HashMap<LifecycleAware, Supervisoree>();
And it is having key as LifecycleAware which is not a NamedComponent. [~bessbd]
[~jholoman], Need your inputs to do this.
> Flume components should stop in the correct order (graceful shutdown)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLUME-2894
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2894
> Project: Flume
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Channel, Node, Sinks+Sources
> Affects Versions: v1.6.0
> Reporter: Piotr Wiecek
>
> Flume components should be stopped in the right way:
> * stop the sources (in order to not receiving further notifications),
> * wait until all events within the channels are consumed by the sinks,
> * stop the channels and the sinks.
> Currently, the shutdown hook stops the components in a random manner.
> E.g.: SINK, CHANNEL, SOURCE.
> Components are stored in the HashMap:
> {code:borderStyle=solid}
> Map<LifecycleAware, Supervisoree> supervisedProcesses;
> ...
> supervisedProcesses = new HashMap<LifecycleAware, Supervisoree>();
> ...
> @Override
> public synchronized void stop() {
> ...
> for (final Entry<LifecycleAware, Supervisoree> entry : supervisedProcesses
> .entrySet()) {
> if (entry.getKey().getLifecycleState().equals(LifecycleState.START)) {
> entry.getValue().status.desiredState = LifecycleState.STOP;
> entry.getKey().stop();
> }
> }
> ....
> {code}
> The problems which we can have:
> * not all Events will be consumed (Sink will be stopped first)
> * Source will continue to accept messages even though other components are
> stopped
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
