This vote is now closed. I will send out the results in a separate email.
Thanks to all who voted! Thank you, Donat On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Brock Noland <br...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked sigs and hashes, manual inspection of various other aspects. > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Hari Shreedharan <hshreedha...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Signatures and checksums look good >> Top level files are all good. >> Build runs fine, simple agent with Seq source, memory channel and HDFS >> sink run fine as well. >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Mike Percy <mpe...@apache.org> wrote: >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > There are some flaky tests which are listed below but I don't think they >> > are release blockers. >> > >> > I performed the following checks: >> > >> > Binary convenience artifact: >> > * Signature and checksums match >> > * LICENSE, NOTICE, and README.md files in the binary convenience artifact >> > look accurate and complete relative to the jars in lib/ >> > * Ran a very quick test with the binary artifact and it >> > worked: ./bin/flume-ng agent -c conf -f >> > conf/flume-conf.properties.template -n >> > agent -Dflume.root.logger=DEBUG,console >> > * Checked that the documentation in docs/ renders: Flume User Guide and >> > Flume Dev Guide are OK. Also spot-checked that the new Kafka security >> > documentation was included in the User Guide >> > >> > Source artifact: >> > * Signature and checksums match >> > * Built Flume from the source artifact using Oracle 1.7.0_80 on Ubuntu >> > Linux 16.04, sanity tested the resulting binary using the above method >> and >> > it worked >> > * RAT checks passed >> > * Built a new source artifact out of the official source artifact and >> > compiled it >> > * I ran the unit tests. Most passed but the below two failed. These are >> > flaky tests (we have a bunch of them in Flume) so I think it's fine not >> to >> > block the release on them. >> > * TestExecSource.testMonitoredCounterGroup - looks like a racy test >> > * TestSpillableMemoryChannel - didn't investigate >> > >> > RC2 looks good to me. >> > >> > Thanks for running this release, Donat! >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Balazs Donat Bessenyei < >> bes...@cloudera.com >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> This is the tenth release for Apache Flume as a top-level project, >> >> version 1.7.0. We are voting on release candidate RC2. >> >> >> >> It fixes the following issues: >> >> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/flume/flume-1.7/CHANGELOG >> >> >> >> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** >> >> >> >> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, *.sha1) >> >> for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bessbd/apache-flume-1.7.0-rc2/ >> >> >> >> Maven staging repo: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapacheflume-1020/ >> >> >> >> The tag to be voted on: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a= >> commit;h=511d868 >> >> >> >> Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >> >> https://www.apache.org/dist/flume/KEYS >> >> >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> >> Donat >> >> >>
