Thank you Christopher, that worked perfectly. Issue resolved, and I learned something. Thanks again!
I'd be happy to add this to some documentation but not sure where it would belong. Might be a niche thing. Kenny On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 11:30 AM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > Okay, so it looks like the failures you're seeing are the result of an old > modules/integration directory that was removed or renamed. Try resetting > your clone with `git clean -fdx` > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 00:39 Kenneth McFarland < > glorifiedcalcula...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > @Christopher : Good, I thought that race condition was fixed in a > previous > > issue so I was concerned and should have looked closer. Thank you for the > > catch sir! > > > > I'm still confused as to why the RAT check is throwing errors. I am > > working off a clean master with the same hash as the one Joe mentioned > > (commit 549d645addb330f4ae2e074447428cb86b5a9a3f). > > > > Here is some environment info: > > > > *MAVEN* > > Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; > > 2017-10-18T00:58:13-07:00) > > Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2 > > Java version: 1.8.0_161, vendor: Oracle Corporation > > Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/jdk1.8.0_161/jre > > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > > OS name: "linux", version: "4.15.0-70-generic", arch: "amd64", family: > > "unix" > > > > *JAVA* > > openjdk 11.0.5 2019-10-15 > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-2ubuntu116.04) > > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-2ubuntu116.04, > mixed > > mode, sharing) > > > > I also have a few other java versions installed like the Oracle 1.8.0 > that > > maven reports above. > > > > *Operating System* > > Linux ubuntu 4.15.0-70-generic #79~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 12 14:01:10 > > UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > I will try this on my MacI notice the apache-rat setDefaultExcludes > > variable is set to true. I'm currently baffled. The errors are the same > if > > I run 'mvn apache-rat:check' or if I run 'mvn verify' or 'mvn clean > > verify''. The logs are kinda large so I simply piped it into a text file, > > as well as included the rat file. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:06 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> I think the stack traces in the logs/test output are intended for that > >> test, because it's specifically checking error handling for a running > >> server (if I remember correctly). > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 18:42 Joseph Koshakow <kosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > I'm running `mvn clean verify` on the master branch > >> > (549d645addb330f4ae2e074447428cb86b5a9a3f) with OpenJDK 1.8 on Ubuntu > >> 18.04 > >> > x86_64. I don't see any issues related to Rat. OracleIT passes and the > >> > entire build is successful, but OracleIT does print the following > >> errors in > >> > the logs > >> > > >> > Running org.apache.fluo.integration.impl.OracleIT > >> > 2019-11-27 18:18:24,087 [thrift.ProcessFunction] ERROR: Internal error > >> > processing getTimestamps > >> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Received timestamp request but Oracle > >> is > >> > not leader > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.oracle.OracleServer.getTimestampsImpl(OracleServer.java:244) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.oracle.OracleServer.getTimestamps(OracleServer.java:224) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.thrift.OracleService$Processor$getTimestamps.getResult(OracleService.java:279) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.thrift.OracleService$Processor$getTimestamps.getResult(OracleService.java:257) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.shaded.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:38) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.shaded.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:39) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.shaded.thrift.server.AbstractNonblockingServer$FrameBuffer.invoke(AbstractNonblockingServer.java:518) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.shaded.thrift.server.Invocation.run(Invocation.java:18) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > >> > 2019-11-27 18:18:24,091 [oracle.OracleClient] ERROR: TException > >> occurred in > >> > doWork() method > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.shaded.thrift.TApplicationException: Internal > error > >> > processing getTimestamps > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.shaded.thrift.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:79) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.thrift.OracleService$Client.recv_getTimestamps(OracleService.java:86) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.thrift.OracleService$Client.getTimestamps(OracleService.java:73) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.oracle.OracleClient$TimestampRetriever.doWork(OracleClient.java:182) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.fluo.core.oracle.OracleClient$TimestampRetriever.run(OracleClient.java:116) > >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > >> > Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 22.911 > >> sec > >> > - in org.apache.fluo.integration.impl.OracleIT > >> > > >> > -Joe > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 5:18 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I have not seen any errors with `mvn clean verify` locally, but > >> > > occasionally, there seems to be errors on Travis. > >> > > I'm building the master branch (currently > >> > > 549d645addb330f4ae2e074447428cb86b5a9a3f) with OpenJDK 11 on Fedora > 31 > >> > > x86_64 with no problems. > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 2:31 PM Kenneth McFarland > >> > > <kennethmcfarl...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Hello, > >> > > > > >> > > > This is just a quick inquiry if anyone else running mvn verify is > >> > getting > >> > > > rat errors that prevent maven from completing. > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm using -Drat.skip=true to bypass but is this normal? > >> > > > > >> > > > Last thing is OracleIT is throwing errors again. I've checked out > >> the > >> > new > >> > > > code and am building on 16.10 Ubuntu x64. > >> > > > > >> > > > If this is something others are experiencing maybe we can see if > >> there > >> > is > >> > > > an open ticket for OracleIT (thought we closed it with switch on > >> lock > >> > > > implementation in Curator). Rat check is new to me. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks a bunch. This is informal, if I'm not insane I'll do a > formal > >> > > ticket > >> > > > or something. Again, thanks! > >> > > > > >> > > > Happy holidays also. > >> > > > > >> > > > I > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >