Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:02 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with
the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
Actually that is the reason why I am proposing that forrest is *not*
officially developing views anymore.
Please reconsider. You are getting unnecessarily carried away by your
emotion. Don't mistakenly read mails as if they were personal complaints
when they are not.
Ok, I did not meant to do that but it seems I did. Sorry!
I was *not* *recommending* it but was *offering* to do so because I
thought that is maybe the best for forrest.
Thank goodness it is "an offer", that implies we have a choice, my
choice is to not accept your offer. We need views, but we (the other
devs) need to spend more time understanding it.
(as promised I will explain my original comments when I have a clearer
head).
Ross