Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:01 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
<plugin name="org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view"
type="internal"
author="Apache Forrest Project"
-
website="http://forrest.apache.org/docs/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.view";
+
website="http://forrest.apache.org/pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/org.apache.forrest.plugin.view";
url="http://forrest.apache.org/plugins/";
version="0.1-dev">
<description>
Actually not all whiteboard plugins are listed in your commit nor in the
docu. e.g. viewHelper is missing.
To appear in the plugins index they need to be in the plugins.xml or
whiteboard-plugins.xml. You never added viewHelper, so it is not there.
I have not added it myself because I thought there may be a reason for
it not being present since you had added view (so I assumed you knew you
needed to do this).
I'm not very happy with the fact that view and viewHelper have created a
dependency in the plugins. I want to sort this out when we start working
on views as a community. viewHelper is not really a plugin because it
doesn't actually do anything on its own. I believe there should be a
fourth type of plugin, a view plugin. Things like viewHelper.xhtml will
go into there.
We will still be able to use the same download mechanism it will just
stop the plugin list getting confused by the viewHelpers. It is this
reasoning that I thought you had left out the viewHelper plugin.
> Can it be that we have to publish (ant build) whiteboard plugins as
> well?
I'm not publishing most of the whiteboard plugins since they are
unstable and I think it would be better if only developers have access
to them. Some of them have been published because they were in the main
plugins directory originally. But none of the new ones have been published.
If you want to publish the docs for them (in order to prevent 404 links
you can do so with "ant deploy-docs" (I will be doing all plugin and
docs deployments tomorrow after the release candidate has been built).
Ross
