David Crossley wrote: > Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > > Johannes Schaefer a ?crit : > > >Ross Gardler schrieb: > > >>Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > > >>> > > >>> The *Who we are* page : http://forrest.apache.org/who.html does not > > >>>explain why some commiters are inactive ? > > >>> (Hope it's not a punishment :-) ) > > >>> > > >>Good point, in fact I am not sure when we consider a committer inactive. > > >>On other projects it is not contributed directly (i.e. post to list, > > >>record an issue, contribute to docs, make a patch etc.) for six months. > > > > >>I don't see anything on our website about this. Is it recorded anywhere? > > No. It is something that we still need to decide > as a project. As you will see, our f.a.o/guidelines.html > are not yet finished. > > Six months since a commit sounds reasonable. > However as you can see from > http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/who.html > no-one ever cleans up the list. I suppose that > could be something for the PMC chair to just do from > time-to-time.
However, if someone is still talking occasionally on the mailing list as i see Johannes doing, then they would still be considered "active". Do other people reckon that too? -David > > >Don't know about the others or documentation > > >but I put my name into inactive since I cannot > > >work on forrest these days ... hope I'll return, > > >soon (I'm on a cocoon adventure trip ;-) > > > > > I was precisely wandering why you were inactive, Johannes. (and I was > > wandering who decided to inactivate you :-( ) > > The best situation is as Johannes said. Put yourself > in the inactive list if you go away. Whenever you come > back then move yourself up. > > -David
