Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Any reason not to move these to sitemap.xmap?

Not that I can see. I think they were originally put into the sub-sitemaps so that we know what is used where. However, they have not been correctly maintained and it is confusing now.

As more and more stuff is moved out to plugins the number of components in the core sitemaps will be reduced in the way originally intended.

And why are these already in sitemap.xmap but commented out?

Just guessing - somebody noticed they weren't used and commented them out in order to indicate this. They probably chose not to remove them incase there was a reason for them to be present. I can't remember when this was done, I guess some time ago so it is probably safe to remove them (although some will be put back because of your other question above).

Anyway, since nobody has said anything on this just go ahead and do what you think is necessary to make the sitemaps clearer.

Ross

Reply via email to