David Crossley wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>David Crossley wrote: >> >>>I revised the list, taking the replies into account >>>and adding some new queries. >>> >>>>- agree the subset of XHTML2 to be used >>>>and document that via example. >>> >>>See other thread. >>> >>>>- create DTD's >>> >>>Why do we need DTDs for use with internal structure? >> >>For using XHTML2 as an input format. > > For that part i did understand the need. If the xml instances > declare them, then the parser needs to resolve them locally. > Same with any document type. > > Of course there are no DTDs yet at Appendix F or G. > > However, we are discussing internal processing, > and i was wondering what is the need for DTDs there. > Is there any need?
No. > Or am i misunderstanding something about XHTML2 and DTDs? Not AFAIU. >>In fact it will be a modularization >>of XHTML2 via RelaxNG validation. ^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>- Decide how to make the pipeline process. >>>>Now we have body-*.html and stuff, but a simpler process >>>>should be devised. ... > Do you mean keep the existing pipelines and > starting this new one so that old and new can > work side-by-side until the new stuff is ready. Correct. No need for a separate branch means easier involvment. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------