On 9/9/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: twilliams > > Date: Wed Sep 7 21:40:42 2005 > > New Revision: 279511 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=279511&view=rev > > Log: > > can't return all the html, head, stuff for insertion in the pipeline. > > temporary solution to get on with pipeline testing > > Why do you want the output to look like document2html output and then be > passed into the existing pipelines?
Because that's how views work right now. I didn't have this grand redesign scheme in my mind at the time. I thought we were getting XHTML2 to work with the current views and replacing the **body-*.html aggregation "part" in the **page pipeline with an xthml2tohtml equivalent was how I did it. > Don't we just want XHTML2 -> output plugin = desired output That's what it is, but views operate on html structured like the output of document2html. I wasn't redesigning views, just getting xhtml2 to work with them. > Meaning we only need an XHTML2_to_HTML stylesheet> > > (I recall a conversation Tim and I had on IRC in which he asked me why > we need the XHTML2HTML stylesheet. I seem to remember the answer I gave > was misleading to say the least. Hopefully recent discussions about the > new pipeline will have clarified - if not I'll try agian when I > understand the intent of this commit, I may be missing something) > > Ross I could very well be missing something but like I tried to explain in the other thread, to get xhtml2 to work with views (or the current skins for that matter) we need two things: 1) a xslt that outputs html with the same structure of document2html 2) a change in the **page pipeline to call that instead of **body-*.html Even when we do what you suggest and use contracts for everything instead of aggregation, the implementation of that contract will still need something similar to this. --tim
