David Crossley wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>
>>the update try experience made me think why are we not splitting cocoon
>>apart from forrest.
>>
>>I mean you would need them both to make forrest running. That would
>>overcome the whole procedure. We can set certain revision numbers of
>>cocoon-2.2 till it is not released. Kind of we having in lenya.
>>
>>Any thoughts?
>
> I don't like it.
Seconded
> I can visualise us having to support a stack of Cocoon user
> questions and we don't have enough people here to help.
>
> Also we use cocoon trunk so that makes it even harder
> for our users.
>
> I would rather than we Forrest committers did a little bit
> of extra work, to make it easier for our developers/users.
Or simply rearrange and separate the Cocoon bits from the Forrest bits
to make update easier.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
