Gav.... wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Crossley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@forrest.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal: interactive planning session for
views/xhtml2/internals
| Gav.... wrote:
| >
| > I will still be in the land of nod, I too am a spectator
| > and hope to catch up with a log file.
|
| That is the trouble with the world being round,
| there will always be someone that is asleep.
|
| We could edge it forward another hour or so
| but that makes the end time very late for Europeans.
|
| -David
So we have mainly Europe , America , the UK ( new home to the ashes)
Hurray!!!! (I've resisted this far ;-)
Now I can see maybe 3 lines there that are acceptable to most suitable times
:-
Australia - WA Australia - N S W Germany
United States - Florida United Kingdom
Sat 17/09/2005 6:00 PM Sat 17/09/2005 8:00 PM Sat 17/09/2005
12:00 PM* Sat 17/09/2005 6:00 AM* Sat 17/09/2005 11:00 AM*
Sat 17/09/2005 7:00 PM Sat 17/09/2005 9:00 PM Sat 17/09/2005
1:00 PM* Sat 17/09/2005 7:00 AM* Sat 17/09/2005 12:00 PM*
Sat 17/09/2005 8:00 PM Sat 17/09/2005 10:00 PM Sat 17/09/2005
2:00 PM* Sat 17/09/2005 8:00 AM* Sat 17/09/2005 1:00 PM*
Or it could the same times Sunday.
Saturday is no good for me at all this week, Sunday evening/night (UK)
is OK (and by night I mean I'm willing to stay up or get up early in
order to make this happen). Unfortunately non of the times you highlight
are in that range.
Next weekend I can't do anytime. The weekend after I'm currently clear
all the way through.
During the week I can (generally) do any of these times.
For future meetings with more time to plan I think the times Gav
suggests here are pretty good, in that they are not really late/early
for anyone. It's just a shame that we want to do weekedns (from my
perspective).
However, I am thinking the subject matter too deep at this stage for me to
make a worthwhile contribution 'at the time',
but I can go over logs and input at a later date.
It is going to be impossible to find a time that suits everyone. I think
the important thing is that we nominate a time and stick to it unless
someone says they *want* to be present and cannot. Is that the case with
the original proposal of 20:00 UTC?
I'm sorry if this sounds like some important members of the community
are being excluded, that is not the intention. Please do speak up if you
*want* to attend but are unable to do so (note that is exactly what I am
doing above).
Ross
