I've started to refactor the sitemaps to use the locationmap. I'm using
the naming convention that Tim suggested during the first Forrest
Tuesday (I've added his notes to the locationmap document in 0.8
site-author).
At the time I agreed to the convention, however, I'm not so sure
anymore. Here's an example of where I'm not sure it is a good idea:
{forrest:stylesheets}/upgrade-skinconf.xsl
would become something like:
transform.skinconf.new-skinconf
This is considerably more verbose and I'm not at all sure that it tells
us anything new. If we just use the filename ("upgrade-skinconf.xsl") we
appear to have the same information, but we do not necessarily imply
anything about the location (which is Tims justification for this).
What we lose by using this naming convention is the ability to look at
the sitemap and then go straight to the file on disk, we would have to
then open the locationmap to see what the actual filename was.
What do others think?
Ross
