Kevin wrote: > Thanks for sticking with me. Just one point to finish with.
> The new code bypasses old working code that some web sites > may depend on? A user may have been happy with the default > cellpadding and cellspacing while setting their own class. > Just a backward compatibility issue, I'm sure unlikely. Yeah, I thought of that too. But then, fixing what I consider inconsistencies and bugs in the old skin I always take the chance that sbdy depends on just this behavior. What do others think? Should I roll back the changes and derive a new skin to apply these and other 'fixes'? -- Ferdinand Soethe
